Cited by 642Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative MechanismsChemokine receptors and signalingInflammation biomarkers and pathways

Neutrophil cell surface receptors and their intracellular signal transduction pathways

Open access
Futosi, Krisztina, Fodor, Szabina, Mócsai, Attila·2013·International Immunopharmacology

Abstract

Neutrophils play a critical role in the host defense against bacterial and fungal infections, but their inappropriate activation also contributes to tissue damage during autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Neutrophils express a large number of cell surface receptors for the recognition of pathogen invasion and the inflammatory environment. Those include G-protein-coupled chemokine and chemoattractant receptors, Fc-receptors, adhesion receptors such as selectins/selectin ligands and integrins, various cytokine receptors, as well as innate immune receptors such as Toll-like receptors and C-type lectins. The various cell surface receptors trigger very diverse signal transduction pathways including activation of heterotrimeric and monomeric G-proteins, receptor-induced and store-operated Ca(2+) signals, protein and lipid kinases, adapter proteins and cytoskeletal rearrangement. Here we provide an overview of the receptors involved in neutrophil activation and the intracellular signal transduction processes they trigger. This knowledge is crucial for understanding how neutrophils participate in antimicrobial host defense and inflammatory tissue damage and may also point to possible future targets of the pharmacological therapy of neutrophil-mediated autoimmune or inflammatory diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.intimp.2013.06.034

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared with those isolated on day 0, neutrophils isolated on day 14 may have contributed to neutrophil degranulation, antigen processing, and the presentation of endogenous peptide antigens and Toll-like receptor cascades, and the Toll-like receptor cascades contributed to the production of IL-1β.

    “Compared with those isolated on day 0, neutrophils isolated on day 14 may have contributed to neutrophil degranulation, antigen processing, and the presentation of endogenous peptide antigens and Toll-like receptor cascades, and the Toll-like receptor cascades contributed to the production of IL-1 β (Figure 3E). 16”

    From Single-Cell RNA Sequencing to Dissect the Immunological Network of Autoimmune Myocarditis. (2020) · cites this paper as [16]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Neutrophil influx into a wound is mediated by chemical signals including IL-8/CXCL8.

    “Their influx is mediated by a number of chemical signals, including IL-8, or CXCL8, as mentioned above, and neutrophils have over 30 different receptors that mitigate their migration and activation response [24].”

    From Immunology of Wound Healing (2018) · cites this paper as [24]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 248 · Cited by 642

Authors
Futosi, K., Fodor, S., & Mócsai, A.
Affiliations
  • Semmelweis University (HU)
  • Corvinus University of Budapest (HU)
Corresponding author
Mócsai, Attila
Venue
International Immunopharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-11
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
638-650
ISSN
1567-5769 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137665452
Cited by
642
References
248
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 3
FWCI
20.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Immunopharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Semmelweis University Repository (Semmelweis University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Research Council (206283)
  • Wellcome Trust (087782)
  • European Union's Seventh Framework Program
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Chemokine receptors and signaling
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Inflammation biomarkers and pathways
Keywords
neutrophils, cell surface receptors, signal transduction, G protein-coupled receptors, chemokine receptors, Fc receptors, selectins, integrins, Toll-like receptors, C-type lectin, store-operated calcium entry, heterotrimeric G proteins, cytoskeletal rearrangement, innate immunity, host defense against infection, autoimmune disease, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Proto-Oncogene Mas, Animals, Humans, Neutrophils, Receptors, Cell Surface, Signal Transduction, Selectins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review