Cited by 36Digital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Research TopicsSchizophrenia research and treatment

Smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment and intervention in a blended coping-focused therapy for distressing voices: development and case illustration

Open access
Bell, Imogen H., Fielding-Smith, Sarah F., Hayward, Mark, Rossell, Susan L., Lim, Michelle H., Farhall, John, Thomas, Neil·2018·Internet Interventions

Abstract

Common approaches to the psychological treatment of distressing voice hearing experiences, such as cognitive behavioural therapy, aim to promote more adaptive cognitive, emotional and behavioural responses to these experiences. Digital technologies such as smartphones show promise for supporting and enhancing these treatments by linking immediate therapeutic settings to the context of daily life. Two promising technologies include ecological momentary assessment and intervention (EMA/I), which may offer a means of advanced assessment and support in daily life, and inform the tailoring of interventions to suit individual needs. In this study, a highly novel intervention approach was developed involving four face-to-face sessions with a psychologist blended with EMA/I between sessions in order to improve coping with distressing voice hearing experiences. The authors describe the background and development of this approach along-side a single case illustration, which supported feasibility and acceptability. This study details how digital technologies such as EMA/I may be used in future as clinical tools to enhance standard psychological treatments and clinical care of people with persisting and distressing experiences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.invent.2018.11.001

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The widespread use of smartphones and other portable devices has rendered experiential sampling a particularly advantageous procedure in clinical studies.

    “The widespread use of smartphones and other portable devices has rendered ES a particularly advantageous procedure in clinical studies (Bell et al., 2018; Nap-van der Vlist et al., 2021).”

    From Online ACT intervention for fibromyalgia: An exploratory study of feasibility and preliminary effectiveness with smartphone-delivered experiential sampling assessment (2022) · cites this paper as Bell et al., 2018

    The Introduction describes experience sampling (EMA) as commonly using smartphone apps and identifies advantages for research and clinical assessment. It also says smartphone ownership is widespread in psychosis populations. It does not establish widespread use of smartphones and other portable devices across clinical-study populations generally. (LLM, conf=0.81)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 80 · Cited by 36

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. van Os J. Verhagen S. Marsman A. Peeters F. Bak M. Marcelis M. … Lataster T. The experience sampling method as an mHealth tool to support self-monitoring, self-insight, and personalized health care in clinical practice Depress. Anxiety 34 6 2017 481 493 28544391

Authors
Bell, I. H., Fielding-Smith, S. F., Hayward, M., Rossell, S. L., Lim, M. H., Farhall, J., & Thomas, N.
Affiliations
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU)
  • La Trobe University (AU)
Corresponding author
Bell, Imogen H.
Venue
Internet Interventions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
14
Pages
18-25
ISSN
2214-7829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2900609363
Cited by
36
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Internet Interventions (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology)
Funders
  • Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship
  • Barbara Dicker Brain Sciences Foundation Grant Scheme
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
auditory verbal hallucinations, ecological momentary assessment, ecological momentary intervention, smartphone-based intervention, cognitive behavioral therapy, feasibility and acceptability, digital mental health tools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review