The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detecting fake news by exploring the consistency of multimodal data
Open accessAbstract
During the outbreak of the new Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in 2020, the spread of fake news has caused serious social panic. Fake news often uses multimedia information such as text and image to mislead readers, spreading and expanding its influence. One of the most important problems in fake news detection based on multimodal data is to extract the general features as well as to fuse the intrinsic characteristics of the fake news, such as mismatch of image and text and image tampering. This paper proposes a Multimodal Consistency Neural Network (MCNN) that considers the consistency of multimodal data and captures the overall characteristics of social media information. Our method consists of five subnetworks: the text feature extraction module, the visual semantic feature extraction module, the visual tampering feature extraction module, the similarity measurement module, and the multimodal fusion module. The text feature extraction module and the visual semantic feature extraction module are responsible for extracting the semantic features of text and vision and mapping them to the same space for a common representation of cross-modal features. The visual tampering feature extraction module is responsible for extracting visual physical and tamper features. The similarity measurement module can directly measure the similarity of multimodal data for the problem of mismatching of image and text. We assess the constructed method in terms of four datasets commonly used for fake news detection. The accuracy of the detection is improved clearly compared to the best available methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 114,148
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 · Cited by 24,533
Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.31.2.211 · Cited by 6,767
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Pujol, J. M., Delgado, J., Ramon Sangüesa, A., & Flache, A. (2005) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · Cited by 5,771
VQA: Visual Question Answering
Antol, S., Agrawal, A., Lu, J., Mitchell, M., Batra, D., Zitnick, C. L., & Parikh, D. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.279 · Cited by 4,487
Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems
Koller, D., Schuurmans, D., Bengio, Y., & Bottou, L. (2008) · Cited by 4,461
Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspective
Shu, K., Sliva, A., Wang, S., Tang, J., & Liu, H. (2017) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/3137597.3137600 · Cited by 3,304
2011 International Conference on Computer Vision
(2011) · doi:10.1109/iccv17851.2011 · Cited by 2,860
Cited by
Multimodal fake news detection via progressive fusion networks
Jing, J., Wu, H., Sun, J., Fang, X., & Zhang, H. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103120 · Cited by 243
Metadata
- Authors
- Xue, J., Wang, Y., Tian, Y., Li, Y., Shi, L., & Wei, L.
- Venue
- Information Processing & Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-09
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 102610
- ISSN
- 0020-0271 (ISSN-L)
- 0306-4573
- OpenAlex
- W3157731560
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 52.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detecting fake news by exploring the consistency of multimodal data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102610
- The paper
- Xue, J., Wang, Y., Tian, Y., Li, Y., Shi, L., & Wei, L. (2021). Detecting fake news by exploring the consistency of multimodal data. Information Processing & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102610
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.