Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 298

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detecting fake news by exploring the consistency of multimodal data

Open access
Xue, Junxiao, Wang, Yabo, Tian, Yichen, Li, Yafei, Shi, Lei, Wei, Lin·2021·Information Processing & Management

Abstract

During the outbreak of the new Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in 2020, the spread of fake news has caused serious social panic. Fake news often uses multimedia information such as text and image to mislead readers, spreading and expanding its influence. One of the most important problems in fake news detection based on multimodal data is to extract the general features as well as to fuse the intrinsic characteristics of the fake news, such as mismatch of image and text and image tampering. This paper proposes a Multimodal Consistency Neural Network (MCNN) that considers the consistency of multimodal data and captures the overall characteristics of social media information. Our method consists of five subnetworks: the text feature extraction module, the visual semantic feature extraction module, the visual tampering feature extraction module, the similarity measurement module, and the multimodal fusion module. The text feature extraction module and the visual semantic feature extraction module are responsible for extracting the semantic features of text and vision and mapping them to the same space for a common representation of cross-modal features. The visual tampering feature extraction module is responsible for extracting visual physical and tamper features. The similarity measurement module can directly measure the similarity of multimodal data for the problem of mismatching of image and text. We assess the constructed method in terms of four datasets commonly used for fake news detection. The accuracy of the detection is improved clearly compared to the best available methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102610

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Cited by

See all 298

Metadata

Authors
Xue, J., Wang, Y., Tian, Y., Li, Y., Shi, L., & Wei, L.
Venue
Information Processing & Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
58
Issue
5
Pages
102610
ISSN
  • 0020-0271 (ISSN-L)
  • 0306-4573
OpenAlex
W3157731560
Cited by
298
References
62
FWCI
52.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detecting fake news by exploring the consistency of multimodal data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102610
The paper
Xue, J., Wang, Y., Tian, Y., Li, Y., Shi, L., & Wei, L. (2021). Detecting fake news by exploring the consistency of multimodal data. Information Processing & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102610

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.