Cited by 39Recommender Systems and TechniquesEthics and Social Impacts of AIGame Theory and Voting Systems

Provider fairness across continents in collaborative recommender systems

Open access
Gómez, Elizabeth, Boratto, Ludovico, Salamó, Maria·2022·Information Processing & Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102719

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Gómez, E., Boratto, L., & Salamó, M.
Affiliations
  • Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
  • University of Cagliari (IT)
Corresponding author
Boratto, Ludovico
Venue
Information Processing & Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
102719
ISSN
  • 0020-0271 (ISSN-L)
  • 0306-4573
OpenAlex
W3205185116
Cited by
39
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9
FWCI
6.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information Processing & Management (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
Keywords
recommender systems, fairness, item exposure, indirect discrimination, re-ranking, equity, movie recommendation, book recommendations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review