CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 286Sustainable Finance and Green BondsEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessEnergy, Environment, Economic Growth

Green credit regulation, induced R&D and green productivity: Revisiting the Porter Hypothesis

Zhang, Dongyang·2021·International Review of Financial Analysis
DOI 10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101723
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101723

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 286

Authors
Zhang, D.
Affiliations
Capital University of Economics and Business (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Dongyang
ORCID
Zhang, Dongyang
Venue
International Review of Financial Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
75
Pages
101723
ISSN
1057-5219 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101723
OpenAlex
W3133996034
Cited by
286
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 12
FWCI
35.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
International Review of Financial Analysis (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Keywords
Porter hypothesis, green total factor productivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review