Cited by 31Face Recognition and PerceptionCOVID-19 and Mental HealthAction Observation and Synchronization

Increased gaze cueing of attention during COVID-19 lockdown.

Open access
Dalmaso, Mario, Castelli, Luigi, Galfano, Giovanni·2021·iScience

Abstract

Affiliation with others is a basic human need. The lockdown implemented for counteracting the COVID-19 pandemic has determined an unprecedented situation of social deprivation, forcing individuals to dramatically reduce face-to-face interactions. This, in turn, has caused relevant consequences on psychological well-being. However, the impact of lockdown-related social isolation on basic cognitive processes is still largely unknown. Here, we focus on social attention and address gaze cueing, namely the ability to shift attention in response to the gaze of others. This is a hard-wired cognitive mechanism critically supporting the establishment of social interactions and pervasive relationships among individuals. Our results show a stronger gaze-cueing effect during, rather than after, the lockdown, whose magnitude was positively correlated with social isolation distress. These findings indicate that, in a condition of prolonged social deprivation, orienting of attention may be shaped by hypersensitivity to social cues, likely due to the strive to reconnect with others.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103283

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • COVID-19-related anxiety is associated with increased attention toward social cues.

    “as well as increased attention toward social cues (56).”

    From The Evolution of Psychological and Behavioral Consequences of Self-Isolation During Lockdown: A Longitudinal Study Across United Kingdom and Italy (2022) · cites this paper as [56]

    The Results and Discussion report that distress about lockdown-related social isolation was positively correlated with gaze cueing, a measure of attention to others’ gaze. The paper does not establish the same association for COVID-19-related anxiety more broadly; its measure concerned distress about restrictions and reduced social interaction. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The discrepancy between our findings and previous literature showing poorer cognitive performance and increased attention toward social cues likely reflects the specific components investigated and the measures used.

    “Previous literature showed that the COVID-19 lockdown was associated with poorer cognitive performance (54, 55) and increased attention toward social cues (56). Our findings seem to go against these results; this discrepancy likely reflects the specific components investigated and the measures used, since previous studies primarily focused on working memory (especially using n-back tasks) or gaze”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 31

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. WHO World Health Organization: Virtual Press Conference on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020 2020 https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/transcripts/who-audio-emergencies-coronavirus-press-conference-full-and-final-11mar2020.pdf?sfvrsn=cb432bb3_2

Authors
Dalmaso, M., Castelli, L., & Galfano, G.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
Dalmaso, Mario
Venue
iScience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
24
Issue
11
Pages
103283
ISSN
2589-0042 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3205329262
Cited by
31
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 5
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • iScience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Università degli Studi di Padova (DPSS-SID2019)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
gaze cueing, social attention, COVID-19 lockdown, social isolation, social deprivation, attentional orienting, social cues, psychological distress, face-to-face interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review