An integrated systems biology approach reveals differences in formate metabolism in the genus Methanothermobacter
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract Methanogenesis allows methanogenic archaea (methanogens) to generate cellular energy for their growth while producing methane. Hydrogenotrophic methanogens thrive on carbon dioxide and molecular hydrogen as sole carbon and energy sources. Thermophilic and hydrogenotrophic Methanothermobacter spp. have been recognized as robust biocatalysts for a circular carbon economy and are now applied in power-to-gas technology. Here, we generated the first manually curated genome-scale metabolic reconstruction for three Methanothermobacter spp‥ We investigated differences in the growth performance of three wild-type strains and one genetically engineered strain in two independent chemostat bioreactor experiments. In the first experiment, with molecular hydrogen and carbon dioxide, we found the highest methane production rate for Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus ΔH, while Methanothermobacter marburgensis Marburg reached the highest biomass growth rate. Systems biology investigations, including implementing a pan-model that contains combined reactions from all three microbes, allowed us to perform an interspecies comparison. This comparison enabled us to identify crucial differences in formate anabolism. In the second experiment, with sodium formate, we found stable growth with an M. thermautotrophicus ΔH plasmid-carrying strain with similar performance parameters compared to wild-type Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus Z-245. Our findings reveal that formate anabolism influences the diversion of carbon to biomass and methane with implications for biotechnological applications of Methanothermobacter spp. in power-to-gas technology and for chemical production. Graphical Abstract Broader context Renewable energy sources (e.g., wind and solar) provide carbon-free electric power. However, their intermittency and offset between peak production and demand generate the need to store this electric power. Furthermore, these technologies alone do not satisfy the demand for carbon-based commodities. Power-to-gas technology provides a means to store intermittent renewable electric power with concomitant carbon dioxide recycling into a chemical energy carrier, such as methane, on a centralized and decentralized scale. This is particularly important to establish equitable energy strategies for all countries, as is highlighted by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. With this work, we provide an integrated systems-biology platform for Methanothermobacter spp. to optimize biological power-to-gas technology and formulate strategies to produce other value-added products besides methane.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 165 · Cited by 14
- Authors
- Casini, I., McCubbin, T., Esquivel-Elizondo, S., Luque, G. G., Evseeva, D., Fink, C., Beblawy, S., Youngblut, N. D., Aristilde, L., Huson, D. H., Dräger, A., Ley, R. E., Marcellin, E., Angenent, L. T., & Molitor, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Tübingen (DE)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Max Planck Institute for Biology (DE)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Molitor, Bastian
- ORCID
- Venue
- iScience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-10
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 108016
- ISSN
- 2589-0042 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10579436
- OpenAlex
- W4386954637
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 165
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- iScience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
- Australian Research Council
- Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
- Max Planck Instituut voor Psycholinguïstiek
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial metabolism and enzyme function
- Keywords
- Methanothermobacter, formate metabolism, methanogenic archaea, power-to-gas, value-added chemicals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review