Cited by 120

Techno-economic analysis of underground hydrogen storage in Europe

Talukdar, Mayukh, Blum, Philipp, Heinemann, Niklas, Miocic, Johannes·2024·iScience

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108771

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experience with converting existing gas storage to hydrogen or building new underground hydrogen storage is so far limited.

    “Yet, experience with converting existing gas storage to hydrogen or building new underground hydrogen storage is so far limited98.”
  • Methanol-based long-duration storage does not depend on highly localized underground sites but allows for aboveground storage that can generally be placed anywhere, which could lead to spatial redistribution of least-cost storage capacity.

    “This technology does not depend on highly localized underground sites but allows for aboveground storage that can generally be placed anywhere98,110, which could lead to spatial redistribution of least-cost storage capacity.”
  • Underground cavern and porous storage energy potentials vary substantially across countries, including newly built and retrofitted storage facilities from natural gas infrastructure.

    “Underground cavern and porous storage energy potentials vary substantially across countries, including newly built and retrofitted storage facilities from natural gas infrastructure98,110.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [1]Conference on the Future of Europe, Report on the Final Outcome 2022 Official Journal of the European Union
  2. [6]Miocic J. Heinemann N. Edlmann K. Scafidi J. Molaei F. Alcalde J. Underground Hydrogen Storage: A Review 2023 Geological Society
  3. [9]Muhammed N.S. Haq B. Al Shehri D. Al-Ahmed A. Rahman M.M. Zaman E. A review on underground hydrogen storage: Insight into geological sites, influencing factors and future outlook Energy Rep. 8 2022 461 499
  4. [11]Muhammed N.S. Haq M.B. Al Shehri D.A. Al-Ahmed A. Rahman M.M. Zaman E. Iglauer S. Hydrogen storage in depleted gas reservoirs: A comprehensive review Fuel 337 2023 127032
  5. [14]Ugarte E.R. Salehi S. A Review on Well Integrity Issues for Underground Hydrogen Storage J. Energy Resour. Technol. 144 2022
  6. [50]Wang J. Wu R. Wei M. Bai B. Xie J. Li Y. A comprehensive review of site selection, experiment and numerical simulation for underground hydrogen storage Gas Science and Engineering 118 2023 205105
  7. [54]Melaina M. Antonia O. Penev M. Blending Hydrogen into Natural Gas Pipeline Networks. A Review of Key Issues 2013
  8. [59]Rosenow J. Is heating homes with hydrogen all but a pipe dream? An evidence review Joule 6 2022 2225 2228
  9. [62]Amirthan T. Perera M.S.A. Underground hydrogen storage in Australia: A review on the feasibility of geological sites Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 48 2023 4300 4328
  10. [68]Gregory S.P. Barnett M.J. Field L.P. Milodowski A.E. Subsurface Microbial Hydrogen Cycling: Natural Occurrence and Implications for Industry Microorganisms 7 2019 53 30769950 PMC6407114
  11. [75]Tarkowski R. Uliasz-Misiak B. Towards underground hydrogen storage: A review of barriers Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 162 2022 112451
  12. [78]Talukdar M. Blum P. Heinemann N. Miocic J. Techno-economic analysis of underground hydrogen storage in Europe SSRN Open Arch. 10 2023 PMC10821165 38283330

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Talukdar, M., Blum, P., Heinemann, N., & Miocic, J.
Venue
iScience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-01
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
108771
ISSN
2589-0042
Cited by
120
References
0
Language
en
Funders
  • Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz (03EI3051A, DEEP.NL.2019.003)
  • Imperial College London
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
  • National Energy Technology Laboratory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review