Cited by 21Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsGene expression and cancer classification

ProteoMixture: A cell type deconvolution tool for bulk tissue proteomic data

Open access
Teng, Pang-ning, Schaaf, Joshua P., Abulez, Tamara, Hood, Brian L., Wilson, Katlin N., Litzi, Tracy J., Mitchell, David, Conrads, Kelly A. +14 more·2024·iScience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Numerous multi-omic investigations of cancer tissue have documented varying and poor pairwise transcript:protein quantitative correlations, and most deconvolution tools aiming to predict cell type proportions (cell admixture) have been developed and credentialed using transcript-level data alone. To estimate cell admixture using protein abundance data, we analyzed proteome and transcriptome data generated from contrived admixtures of tumor, stroma, and immune cell models or those selectively harvested from the tissue microenvironment by laser microdissection from high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) tumors. Co-quantified transcripts and proteins performed similarly to estimate stroma and immune cell admixture (r ≥ 0.63) in two commonly used deconvolution algorithms, ESTIMATE or Consensus TME . We further developed and optimized protein-based signatures estimating cell admixture proportions and benchmarked these using bulk tumor proteomic data from over 150 patients with HGSOC. The optimized protein signatures supporting cell type proportion estimates from bulk tissue proteomic data are available at https://lmdomics.org/ProteoMixture/.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109198

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Teng, P.-N., Schaaf, J. P., Abulez, T., Hood, B. L., Wilson, K. N., Litzi, T. J., Mitchell, D., Conrads, K. A., Hunt, A. L., Olowu, V., Oliver, J., Park, F. S., Edwards, M., Chiang, A., Wilkerson, M. D., Raj-Kumar, P.-K., Tarney, C. M., Darcy, K. M., Phippen, N. T., Maxwell, G. L., Conrads, T. P., & Bateman, N. W.
Affiliations
  • Henry M. Jackson Foundation (US)
  • Inova Health System (US)
  • Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
  • Windber Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Conrads, Thomas P.
  • Bateman, Nicholas W.
Venue
iScience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
109198
ISSN
2589-0042 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391755943
Cited by
21
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • iScience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Defense Health Agency Consortium
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
Keywords
cell type deconvolution, high-grade serous ovarian cancer, tumor microenvironment, immune cell proportions, proteomic signatures, transcript-protein correlation, laser microdissection, estimates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review