Cited by 2Protein Structure and DynamicsGene expression and cancer classificationBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Structural analysis of genomic and proteomic signatures reveal dynamic expression of intrinsically disordered regions in breast cancer

Open access
Zatorski, Nicole, Sun, Yifei, Elmas, Abdulkadir, Dallago, Christian, Karl, Timothy, Stein, David, Rost, Burkhard, Huang, Kuan-Lin +2 more·2024·iScience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Structural features of proteins capture underlying information about protein evolution and function, which enhances the analysis of proteomic and transcriptomic data. Here, we develop Structural Analysis of Gene and protein Expression Signatures (SAGES), a method that describes expression data using features calculated from sequence-based prediction methods and 3D structural models. We used SAGES, along with machine learning, to characterize tissues from healthy individuals and those with breast cancer. We analyzed gene expression data from 23 breast cancer patients and genetic mutation data from the Catalog of Somatic Mutations In Cancer database as well as 17 breast tumor protein expression profiles. We identified prominent expression of intrinsically disordered regions in breast cancer proteins as well as relationships between drug perturbation signatures and breast cancer disease signatures. Our results suggest that SAGES is generally applicable to describe diverse biological phenomena including disease states and drug effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110640

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Zatorski, N., Sun, Y., Elmas, A., Dallago, C., Karl, T., Stein, D., Rost, B., Huang, K.-L., Walsh, M., & Schlessinger, A.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
Zatorski, Nicole
Venue
iScience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-09
Volume
27
Issue
9
Pages
110640
ISSN
2589-0042 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401386769
Cited by
2
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • iScience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (F30 HL160179)
  • National Institutes of Health (U01 CA271318, R01 HD107528)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
breast cancer, intrinsically disordered regions, protein structural properties, sage, gene expression signatures, proteomic signatures, somatic mutations, protein 3D structure, protein evolution, cancer tissue classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review