The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validation of digital elevation models from SRTM X-SAR for applications in hydrologic modeling
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies have identified a significant error discrepancy in global DEMs within densely forested areas, primarily due to sensor limitations when accurately capturing terrain elevation.
“Previous studies have identified a significant error discrepancy in global DEMs within densely forested areas [49][50][51][52], primarily due to sensor limitations when accurately capturing terrain elevation.”
From ANADEM: A Digital Terrain Model for South America (2024) · cites this paper as [50]
Citations
Cites
BEVEN, K. J., & KIRKBY, M. J. (1979) · Hydrological Sciences Bulletin · doi:10.1080/02626667909491834 · Cited by 6,670
Validation of surface height from shuttle radar topography mission using shuttle laser altimeter
Sun, G., Ranson, K. J., Kharuk, V. I., & Kovacs, K. (2003) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2003.09.001 · Cited by 233
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Allen, 1994, Downstream channel geometry for use in planning-level models, Water Resources Bulletin, 30, 663, 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1994.tb03321.x · DOI
- Ambroise, 1996, Towards a generalisation of the TOPMODEL concepts: topographic indices of hydrological similarity, Water Resources Research, 32, 2135, 10.1029/95WR03716 · DOI
- Beven, 1993, Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrologic modeling, Advances in Water Resources, 16, 41, 10.1016/0309-1708(93)90028-E · DOI
- Eineder, 2003, Recovering radar shadow to improve interferometric phase unwrapping and DEM Reconstruction, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41, 2959, 10.1109/TGRS.2003.821266 · DOI
- 2004, vol. 9
- Fairfield, 1991, Drainage networks from grid digital elevation models, Water Resources Research, 30, 1681
- Farr, 2001, The shuttle radar topography mission, Eos, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 81, 583, 10.1029/EO081i048p00583 · DOI
- Franchini, 1996, Physical interpretation and sensitivity analysis of the TOPMODEL, Journal of Hydrology, 175, 293, 10.1016/S0022-1694(96)80015-1 · DOI
- Green, 1911, Studies on soil Physics: 1. The flow of air and water through soils, Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4, 1
- Hastings, 1998, Development and assessment of the global land one-km base elevation digital elevation model (GLOBE), ISPRS Archives, 32, 218
- Ludwig, 2000, Modelling catchment hydrology within a GIS-based SVAT model framework, Hydrology and Earth System Science, 4, 239, 10.5194/hess-4-239-2000 · DOI
- Ludwig, 2000, Applications of digital elevation models from SAR interferometry for hydrologic modelling, Photogrammetrie, Fernerkundung, Geoinformation, 2, 6
- Ludwig, 2003, Modelling floods in the Ammer catchment: limitations and challenges from a coupled meteo-hydrological model approach, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 7, 833, 10.5194/hess-7-833-2003 · DOI
- Mark, 1984, Automatic detection of drainage networks from digital elevation models, Cartographica, 21, 168, 10.3138/10LM-4435-6310-251R · DOI
- Martz, 1992, Numerical definition of drainage network and subcatchment areas from digital elevation models, Computers & Geosciences, 18, 747, 10.1016/0098-3004(92)90007-E · DOI
- Mauser, 1998, Modelling the spatial distribution of evapotranspiration on different scales using remote sensing data, Journal of Hydrology, 212–213, 250, 10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00228-5 · DOI
- Monti Guarnieri, 1996, ScanSAR focusing and interferometry, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 34, 1029, 10.1109/36.508420 · DOI
- Obled, 1994, The sensitivity of hydrological models to spatial rainfall patterns: an evaluation using observed data, Journal of Hydrology, 159, 305, 10.1016/0022-1694(94)90263-1 · DOI
- Rabus, 2003, The shuttle radar topography mission — a new class of digital elevation models acquires by spaceborne radar, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 57, 241, 10.1016/S0924-2716(02)00124-7 · DOI
- Saulnier, 1998, Including spatially variable soil depths in TOPMODEL, Journal of Hydrology, 202, 158, 10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00059-0 · DOI
- Smith, 2003, Accuracy and resolution of shuttle radar topography mission data, Geophysical Research Letters, 30, 20, 10.1029/2002GL016643 · DOI
- Strahler, 1957, Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 38, 913, 10.1029/TR038i006p00913 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ANADEM: A Digital Terrain Model for South America
Laipelt, L., Comini de Andrade, B., Collischonn, W., de Amorim Teixeira, A., Paiva, R. C. D. D., & Ruhoff, A. (2024) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs16132321 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Ludwig, R., & Schneider, P.
- Venue
- ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 339-358
- ISSN
- 0924-2716
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review