Cited by 110

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validation of digital elevation models from SRTM X-SAR for applications in hydrologic modeling

Ludwig, Ralf, Schneider, Philipp·2006·ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2006.05.003

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies have identified a significant error discrepancy in global DEMs within densely forested areas, primarily due to sensor limitations when accurately capturing terrain elevation.

    “Previous studies have identified a significant error discrepancy in global DEMs within densely forested areas [49][50][51][52], primarily due to sensor limitations when accurately capturing terrain elevation.”

    From ANADEM: A Digital Terrain Model for South America (2024) · cites this paper as [50]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Allen, 1994, Downstream channel geometry for use in planning-level models, Water Resources Bulletin, 30, 663, 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1994.tb03321.x · DOI
  2. Ambroise, 1996, Towards a generalisation of the TOPMODEL concepts: topographic indices of hydrological similarity, Water Resources Research, 32, 2135, 10.1029/95WR03716 · DOI
  3. Beven, 1993, Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrologic modeling, Advances in Water Resources, 16, 41, 10.1016/0309-1708(93)90028-E · DOI
  4. Eineder, 2003, Recovering radar shadow to improve interferometric phase unwrapping and DEM Reconstruction, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41, 2959, 10.1109/TGRS.2003.821266 · DOI
  5. 2004, vol. 9
  6. Fairfield, 1991, Drainage networks from grid digital elevation models, Water Resources Research, 30, 1681
  7. Farr, 2001, The shuttle radar topography mission, Eos, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 81, 583, 10.1029/EO081i048p00583 · DOI
  8. Franchini, 1996, Physical interpretation and sensitivity analysis of the TOPMODEL, Journal of Hydrology, 175, 293, 10.1016/S0022-1694(96)80015-1 · DOI
  9. Green, 1911, Studies on soil Physics: 1. The flow of air and water through soils, Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4, 1
  10. Hastings, 1998, Development and assessment of the global land one-km base elevation digital elevation model (GLOBE), ISPRS Archives, 32, 218
  11. Ludwig, 2000, Modelling catchment hydrology within a GIS-based SVAT model framework, Hydrology and Earth System Science, 4, 239, 10.5194/hess-4-239-2000 · DOI
  12. Ludwig, 2000, Applications of digital elevation models from SAR interferometry for hydrologic modelling, Photogrammetrie, Fernerkundung, Geoinformation, 2, 6
  13. Ludwig, 2003, Modelling floods in the Ammer catchment: limitations and challenges from a coupled meteo-hydrological model approach, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 7, 833, 10.5194/hess-7-833-2003 · DOI
  14. Mark, 1984, Automatic detection of drainage networks from digital elevation models, Cartographica, 21, 168, 10.3138/10LM-4435-6310-251R · DOI
  15. Martz, 1992, Numerical definition of drainage network and subcatchment areas from digital elevation models, Computers & Geosciences, 18, 747, 10.1016/0098-3004(92)90007-E · DOI
  16. Mauser, 1998, Modelling the spatial distribution of evapotranspiration on different scales using remote sensing data, Journal of Hydrology, 212–213, 250, 10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00228-5 · DOI
  17. Monti Guarnieri, 1996, ScanSAR focusing and interferometry, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 34, 1029, 10.1109/36.508420 · DOI
  18. Obled, 1994, The sensitivity of hydrological models to spatial rainfall patterns: an evaluation using observed data, Journal of Hydrology, 159, 305, 10.1016/0022-1694(94)90263-1 · DOI
  19. Rabus, 2003, The shuttle radar topography mission — a new class of digital elevation models acquires by spaceborne radar, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 57, 241, 10.1016/S0924-2716(02)00124-7 · DOI
  20. Saulnier, 1998, Including spatially variable soil depths in TOPMODEL, Journal of Hydrology, 202, 158, 10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00059-0 · DOI
  21. Smith, 2003, Accuracy and resolution of shuttle radar topography mission data, Geophysical Research Letters, 30, 20, 10.1029/2002GL016643 · DOI
  22. Strahler, 1957, Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 38, 913, 10.1029/TR038i006p00913 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ludwig, R., & Schneider, P.
Venue
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-08
Volume
60
Issue
5
Pages
339-358
ISSN
0924-2716
Cited by
110
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review