The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Disaster damage detection through synergistic use of deep learning and 3D point cloud features derived from very high resolution oblique aerial images, and multiple-kernel-learning
Open accessAbstract
Oblique aerial images offer views of both building roofs and facades, and thus have been recognized as a potential source to detect severe building damages caused by destructive disaster events such as earthquakes. Therefore, they represent an important source of information for first responders or other stakeholders involved in the post-disaster response process. Several automated methods based on supervised learning have already been demonstrated for damage detection using oblique airborne images. However, they often do not generalize well when data from new unseen sites need to be processed, hampering their practical use. Reasons for this limitation include image and scene characteristics, though the most prominent one relates to the image features being used for training the classifier. Recently features based on deep learning approaches, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have been shown to be more effective than conventional hand-crafted features, and have become the state-of-the-art in many domains, including remote sensing. Moreover, often oblique images are captured with high block overlap, facilitating the generation of dense 3D point clouds – an ideal source to derive geometric characteristics. We hypothesized that the use of CNN features, either independently or in combination with 3D point cloud features, would yield improved performance in damage detection. To this end we used CNN and 3D features, both independently and in combination, using images from manned and unmanned aerial platforms over several geographic locations that vary significantly in terms of image and scene characteristics. A multiple-kernel-learning framework, an effective way for integrating features from different modalities, was used for combining the two sets of features for classification. The results are encouraging: while CNN features produced an average classification accuracy of about 91%, the integration of 3D point cloud features led to an additional improvement of about 3% (i.e. an average classification accuracy of 94%). The significance of 3D point cloud features becomes more evident in the model transferability scenario (i.e., training and testing samples from different sites that vary slightly in the aforementioned characteristics), where the integration of CNN and 3D point cloud features significantly improved the model transferability accuracy up to a maximum of 7% compared with the accuracy achieved by CNN features alone. Overall, an average accuracy of 85% was achieved for the model transferability scenario across all experiments. Our main conclusion is that such an approach qualifies for practical use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Large-Scale Video Classification with Convolutional Neural Networks
Karpathy, A., Toderici, G., Shetty, S., Leung, T., Sukthankar, R., & Fei-Fei, L. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.223 · Cited by 6,354
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- Achanta, 2012, SLIC superpixels compared to state-of-the-art superpixel methods, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 34, 2274, 10.1109/TPAMI.2012.120 · DOI · Paper page
- Arivazhagan, 2006, Texture classification using Gabor wavelets based rotation invariant features, Pattern Recogn. Lett., 27, 1976, 10.1016/j.patrec.2006.05.008 · DOI
- Bengio, 2013, Representation learning: a review and new perspectives, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 35, 1798, 10.1109/TPAMI.2013.50 · DOI · Paper page
- Bucak, 2014, Multiple kernel learning for visual object recognition: a review, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 36, 1354, 10.1109/TPAMI.2013.212 · DOI · Paper page
- Cao, Z., Principe, J.C., Ouyang, B., 2015. Group feature selection in image classification with multiple kernel learning. In: 2015 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pp. 1–5. · DOI
- Castelluccio, M., Poggi, G., Sansone, C., Verdoliva, L., 2015. Land use classification in remote sensing images by convolutional neural networks, arXiv:1508.00092 [cs.CV]. · arXiv
- Cheng, 2016, A survey on object detection in optical remote sensing images, ISPRS J. Photogrammetry Remote Sens., 117, 11, 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.03.014 · DOI · Paper page
- Dell'Acqua, 2012, Remote sensing and earthquake damage assessment: experiences, limits, and perspectives, Proc. IEEE, 100, 2876, 10.1109/JPROC.2012.2196404 · DOI
- Dong, 2013, A comprehensive review of earthquake-induced building damage detection with remote sensing techniques, ISPRS J. Photogrammetry Remote Sens., 84, 85, 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.06.011 · DOI · Paper page
- Fernandez Galarreta, 2015, UAV-based urban structural damage assessment using object-based image analysis and semantic reasoning, Natl. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1087, 10.5194/nhess-15-1087-2015 · DOI
- Ferraz, 2014, Object recognition based on bag of features and a new local pattern descriptor, Int. J. Pattern Recognit Artif Intell., 28, 1, 10.1142/S0218001414550106 · DOI
- Fu, 2016, Visual cortex inspired CNN model for feature construction in text analysis, Frontiers Comput. Neurosci., 10, 1
- Gerke, 2011, Automatic structural seismic damage assessment with airborne oblique Pictometry© imagery, Photogrammetric Eng. Remote Sens., 77, 885, 10.14358/PERS.77.9.885 · DOI
- Gevaert, 2016, Classification of informal settlements through the integration of 2D and 3D features extracted from UAV data, ISPRS Ann. Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., III-3, 317, 10.5194/isprs-annals-III-3-317-2016 · DOI
- Golovinskiy, A., Kim, V.G., Funkhouser, T., 2009. Shape-based recognition of 3D point clouds in urban environments. In: IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 2154–2161. · DOI · Paper page
- Gönen, 2011, Multiple kernel learning algorithms, J. Mach. Learning Res., 12, 2211
- Gu, 2015, A novel MKL model of integrating LIDAR data and MSI for urban area classification, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 53, 5312, 10.1109/TGRS.2015.2421051 · DOI
- Hackel, 2016, Fast semantic segmentation of 3D point clouds with strongly varying density, ISPRS Ann. Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., Prague, Czech Republic, 3, 177
- Han, 2014, Overcome support vector machine diagnosis overfitting, Cancer Inf., 13, 145
- Hu, 2015, Transferring deep convolutional neural networks for the scene classification of high-resolution remote sensing imagery, Remote Sens., 7, 14680, 10.3390/rs71114680 · DOI · Paper page
- Katz, 2007, Direct visibility of point sets, ACM Trans. Graphics (TOG), 26, 10.1145/1276377.1276407 · DOI
- Kerle, 2013, Collaborative damage mapping for emergency response: the role of cognitive systems engineering, Natl. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. (NHESS), 13, 97, 10.5194/nhess-13-97-2013 · DOI
- Khoshelham, 2013, Segment-based classification of damaged building roofs in aerial laser scanning data, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., 10, 1258, 10.1109/LGRS.2013.2257676 · DOI
- Kim, Y., 2014. Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. arXiv:1408.5882v2 [cs.CL]. · DOI · Paper page
- Li, 2011, An improved approach of information extraction for earthquake-damaged buildings using high-resolution imagery, J. Earthquake Tsunami, 05, 389, 10.1142/S1793431111001157 · DOI
- Ma, 2016, An automatic procedure for early disaster change mapping based on optical remote sensing, Remote Sens., 8, 10.3390/rs8040272 · DOI
- Narayanan, A., Chandramohan, M., Chen, L., Liu, Y., Saminathan, S., 2016. Adaptive and scalable android malware detection through online learning. arXiv:1606.08928 [cs.LG]. · DOI
- Nex, 2014, UAV for 3D mapping applications: a review, Appl. Geomatics, 6, 1, 10.1007/s12518-013-0120-x · DOI · Paper page
- Rakotomamonjy, 2008, Simple MKL, J. Mach. Learning Res., 9, 2491
- Samadzadegan, 2008, Automatic detection and classification of damaged buildings, using high resolution satellite imagery and vector data, Int. Arch. Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., 37, 415
- Sherrah, J., 2016. Fully convolutional networks for dense semantic labelling of high-resolution aerial imagery. arXiv:1606.02585 [cs.CV]. · arXiv
- Szegedy, 2015, Going deeper with convolutions, Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vision Pattern Recognit., 1
- Tang, Y., 2013. Deep learning using linear support vector machines. arXiv preprint arXiv:1306.0239. · arXiv
- Tian, 2013, A review on image feature extraction and representation techniques, Int. J. Multimedia Ubiquitous Eng., 8, 385
- Tu, 2016, Automatic building damage detection method using high-resolution remote sensing images and 3D GIS model, ISPRS Ann. Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., III-8, 43, 10.5194/isprs-annals-III-8-43-2016 · DOI
- Velizhev, 2012, Implicit shape models for object detection in 3D point clouds, ISPRS Ann. Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., I-3, 179, 10.5194/isprsannals-I-3-179-2012 · DOI
- Vetrivel, 2016, Potential of multi-temporal oblique airborne imagery for structural damage assessment, ISPRS Ann. Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., III-3, 355, 10.5194/isprs-annals-III-3-355-2016 · DOI
- Vetrivel, 2015, Identification of damage in buildings based on gaps in 3D point clouds from very high resolution oblique airborne images, ISPRS J. Photogrammetry Remote Sens., 105, 61, 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.03.016 · DOI
- Vetrivel, 2015, Segmentation of UAV-based images incorporating 3D point cloud information, Int. Arch. Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XL-3/W2, 261, 10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-3-W2-261-2015 · DOI
- Vetrivel, 2016, Identification of structurally damaged areas in airborne oblique images using a visual-bag-of-words approach, Remote Sens., 8, 10.3390/rs8030231 · DOI
- Weinmann, 2015, Semantic point cloud interpretation based on optimal neighborhoods, relevant features and efficient classifiers, ISPRS J. Photogrammetry Remote Sens., 105, 286, 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.01.016 · DOI · Paper page
- Weinmann, M., Mallet, C., Bredif, M., 2016. Detection, segmentation and localization of individual trees from mms point cloud data. In: GEOBIA 2016: Solutions and Synergies., University of Twente Faculty of Geo-Information and Earth Observation (ITC). · DOI
- Xu, 2010, Object classification of aerial images with bag-of-visual words, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., 7, 366, 10.1109/LGRS.2009.2035644 · DOI
- Zeiler, 2014, Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks, Eur. Conf. Comput. Vision, 818
- Zhou, 2015, Weakly supervised target detection in remote sensing images based on transferred deep features and negative bootstrapping, Multidimension. Syst. Signal Process., 1
Cited by
Deep learning in remote sensing applications: A meta-analysis and review
Ma, L., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Ye, Y., Yin, G., & Johnson, B. A. (2019) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.04.015 · Cited by 2,456
Applications of artificial intelligence for disaster management
Sun, W., Bocchini, P., & Davison, B. D. (2020) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-020-04124-3 · Cited by 491
Abid, S. K., Sulaiman, N., Chan, S. W., Nazir, U., Abid, M., Han, H., Ariza-Montes, A., & Vega-Muñoz, A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132212560 · Cited by 267
A Survey on an Emerging Area: Deep Learning for Smart City Data
Chen, Q., Wang, W., Wu, F., De, S., Wang, R., Zhang, B., & Huang, X. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tetci.2019.2907718 · Cited by 167
Liu, T., & Abd-Elrahman, A. (2018) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.03.006 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Vetrivel, A., Gerke, M., Kerle, N., Nex, F., & Vosselman, G.
- Venue
- ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 140
- Pages
- 45-59
- ISSN
- 0924-2716 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2593771152
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 34.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disaster damage detection through synergistic use of deep learning and 3D point cloud features derived from very high resolution oblique aerial images, and multiple-kernel-learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.03.001
- The paper
- Vetrivel, A., Gerke, M., Kerle, N., Nex, F., & Vosselman, G. (2018). Disaster damage detection through synergistic use of deep learning and 3D point cloud features derived from very high resolution oblique aerial images, and multiple-kernel-learning. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.03.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.