The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Accuracy assessment of the global TanDEM-X Digital Elevation Model with GPS data
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Slope has a greater influence than aspect on the vertical accuracy of DEMs.
“These results suggest that slope has a greater influence than aspect on the vertical accuracy of DEMs, supporting the conclusions of previous studies [61,63].”
From ANADEM: A Digital Terrain Model for South America (2024) · cites this paper as [63]
Section 3.4 (page unavailable) reports higher RMSE, NMAD, and LE90 for TanDEM-X terrain with slopes above 10°, supporting an effect of slope on vertical accuracy. The paper does not compare slope with aspect, so it does not establish that slope has the greater influence. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Baade, 2016, TanDEM-X IDEM precision and accuracy assessment based on a large assembly of differential GNSS measurements in Kruger National Park, South Africa, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 119, 496, 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.05.005 · DOI
- Bolkas, 2016, Assessing digital elevation model uncertainty using GPS survey data, J. Surv. Eng., 142, 10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000169 · DOI
- Borla Tridon, 2013, TanDEM-X: DEM acquisition in the third year era, Int. J. Space Sci. Eng., 1, 367, 10.1504/IJSPACESE.2013.059270 · DOI
- Carabajal, 2005, ICESat validation of SRTM C-band digital elevation models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L22S01, 10.1029/2005GL023957 · DOI · Paper page
- Gesch, 2012, Validation of the ASTER global digital elevation model version 2 over the conterminous United States, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XXXIX-B4, 281, 10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXIX-B4-281-2012 · DOI · Paper page
- Gesch, 2016, Validation of the ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model version 3 over the conterminous United States, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLI-B4, 143, 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B4-143-2016 · DOI
- Gonzalez, 2015, Relative height accuracy estimation method for InSAR-based DEMs, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens., 8, 5352, 10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2474159 · DOI
- Gruber, 2012, Operational TanDEM-X DEM calibration and first validation results, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens., 73, 39
- Gruber, 2016, The TanDEM-X DEM mosaicking: Fusion of multiple acquisitions using InSAR quality parameters, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 9, 1047, 10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2421879 · DOI
- Höhle, 2009, Accuracy assessment of digital elevation models by means of robust statistical methods, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 64, 398, 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.02.003 · DOI · Paper page
- Homer, 2015, Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States-Representing a decade of land cover change information, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 81, 345
- Huber, M., Wessel, B., Kosmann, D., Felbier, A., Schwieger, V., Habermeyer, M., Wendleder, A., Roth, A., 2009. Ensuring globally the TanDEM-X height accuracy: analysis of the reference data sets ICESat, SRTM, and KGPS-Tracks. Proceedings of IGARSS 2009, Cape Town, South Africa. · DOI
- Jacobsen, 2010, Analysis of ASTER GDEM elevation models, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 38, 1
- Krieger, 2007, TanDEM-X: a satellite formation for high resolution SAR interferometry, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 45, 3317, 10.1109/TGRS.2007.900693 · DOI
- Lachaise, 2018, The dual-baseline phase unwrapping correction framework for the TanDEM-X mission part1: Theoretical description and algorithms, IEEE Trans. Geosci. and Remote Sens., 56, 780, 10.1109/TGRS.2017.2754923 · DOI
- Maune, D.F. (Ed.), 2007. Digital Elevation Model Technologies and Applications: The DEM User Manual, second ed. ISBN: 1-57083-082-7.
- Mouratidis, 2010, SRTM 3″ DEM (versions 1, 2, 3, 4) validation by means of extensive kinematic GPS measurements: a case study from North Greece, Int. J. Remote Sens., 31, 6205, 10.1080/01431160903401403 · DOI
- Rexer, 2016, Evaluation of intermediate TanDEM-X digital elevation data products over Tasmania using other digital elevation models and accurate heights from the Australian National Gravity Database, Aust. J. Earth Sci., 63, 599, 10.1080/08120099.2016.1238440 · DOI
- Rizzoli, 2017, Generation and performance assessment of the global TanDEM-X Digital Elevation Model, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 132, 119, 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.08.008 · DOI
- Rodríguez, 2006, A global assessment of the SRTM performance, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 72, 249, 10.14358/PERS.72.3.249 · DOI · Paper page
- Schwieger, V., Schweitzer, J., Kosmann, D., 2009. GPS precise point positioning as a method to evaluate global TanDEM-X digital elevation model. VII FIG Regional Conference, Hanoi, Vietnam.
- Takaku, J., Tadono, T., Tsutsui, K., Ichikawa, M., 2016. Validation of ‘AW3D’ Global DSM generated from ALOS PRISM. Int. Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. III-4, 25–31. · DOI · Paper page
- Wessel, B., Marschalk, U., Gruber, A., Huber, M., Hahmann, T., Roth, A., Habermeyer, M., Kosmann, D., 2008. Design of the DEM Mosaicking and Calibration Processor for TanDEM-X. Proceedings of EUSAR 2008, Friedrichshafen, Germany, 4, 111–114.
- Zwally, 2002, ICESat’s laser measurements of polar, ice, atmosphere, ocean, and land, J. Geodyn., 34, 405, 10.1016/S0264-3707(02)00042-X · DOI
- Zink, 2014, TanDEM-X: the new global DEM takes shape, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag., 2, 8, 10.1109/MGRS.2014.2318895 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ANADEM: A Digital Terrain Model for South America
Laipelt, L., Comini de Andrade, B., Collischonn, W., de Amorim Teixeira, A., Paiva, R. C. D. D., & Ruhoff, A. (2024) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs16132321 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Wessel, B., Huber, M., Wohlfart, C., Marschalk, U., Kosmann, D., & Roth, A.
- ORCID
- Wessel, Birgit
- Venue
- ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-05
- Volume
- 139
- Pages
- 171-182
- ISSN
- 0924-2716
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie (50 EE 0601)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
