The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating the capability of the Sentinel 2 data for soil organic carbon prediction in croplands
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The short revisit time of the Sentinel-2 (S2) constellation entails a large availability of remote sensing data, but S2 data have been rarely used to predict soil organic carbon (SOC) content. Thus, this study aims at comparing the capability of multispectral S2 and airborne hyperspectral remote sensing data for SOC prediction, and at the same time, we investigated the importance of spectral and spatial resolution through the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the variable importance in the prediction (VIP) models and the spatial variability of the SOC maps at field and regional scales. We tested the capability of the S2 data to predict SOC in croplands with quite different soil types and parent materials in Germany, Luxembourg and Belgium, using multivariate statistics and local ground calibration with soil samples. We split the calibration dataset into sub-regions according to soil maps and built a multivariate regression model within each sub-region. The prediction accuracy obtained by S2 data is generally slightly lower than that retrieved by airborne hyperspectral data. The ratio of performance to deviation (RPD) is higher than 2 in Luxembourg (2.6) and German (2.2) site, while it is 1.1 in the Belgian area. After the spectral resampling of the airborne data according to S2 band, the prediction accuracy did not change for four out of five of the sub-regions. The variable importance values obtained by S2 data showed the same trend as the airborne VIP values, while the importance of SWIR bands decreased using airborne data resampled according the S2 bands. These differences of VIP values can be explained by the loss of spectral resolution as compared to APEX data and the strong difference in terms of SNR between the SWIR region and other spectral regions. The investigation on the spatial variability of the SOC maps derived by S2 data has shown that the spatial resolution of S2 is adequate to describe SOC variability both within field and at regional scale.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures.
Savitzky, A., & Golay, M. J. E. (1964) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac60214a047 · Cited by 21,904
PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics
Wold, S., Sjöström, M., & Eriksson, L. (2001) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/s0169-7439(01)00155-1 · Cited by 10,084
Soil Carbon Sequestration Impacts on Global Climate Change and Food Security
Lal, R. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1097396 · Cited by 8,376
McBratney, A. B., Mendonça Santos, M. L., & Minasny, B. (2003) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(03)00223-4 · Cited by 3,651
Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty
Stein, M. L., Chiles, J.-P., & Delfiner, P. (2000) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2669569 · Cited by 2,880
Performance of some variable selection methods when multicollinearity is present
Chong, I.-G., & Jun, C.-H. (2005) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2004.12.011 · Cited by 2,049
Multivariate geostatistics: an introduction with applications
(1996) · International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts · doi:10.1016/s0148-9062(97)87459-1 · Cited by 1,422
The use of remote sensing in soil and terrain mapping — A review
Mulder, V. L., de Bruin, S., Schaepman, M. E., & Mayr, T. R. (2011) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.12.018 · Cited by 899
The EnMAP Spaceborne Imaging Spectroscopy Mission for Earth Observation
Guanter, L., Kaufmann, H., Segl, K., Foerster, S., Rogass, C., Chabrillat, S., Kuester, T., Hollstein, A., Rossner, G., Chlebek, C., et al. (2015) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs70708830 · Cited by 838
Self-citation
Cited by
Remote Sensing Techniques for Soil Organic Carbon Estimation: A Review
Angelopoulou, T., Tziolas, N., Balafoutis, A., Zalidis, G., & Bochtis, D. (2019) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs11060676 · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Authors
- Castaldi, F., Hueni, A., Chabrillat, S., Ward, K., Buttafuoco, G., Bomans, B., Vreys, K., Brell, M., & van Wesemael, B.
- Venue
- ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 147
- Pages
- 267-282
- ISSN
- 0924-2716 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2905192710
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 9.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating the capability of the Sentinel 2 data for soil organic carbon prediction in croplands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.11.026
- The paper
- Castaldi, F., Hueni, A., Chabrillat, S., Ward, K., Buttafuoco, G., Bomans, B., Vreys, K., Brell, M., & van Wesemael, B. (2019). Evaluating the capability of the Sentinel 2 data for soil organic carbon prediction in croplands. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.11.026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.