The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimate of winter-wheat above-ground biomass based on UAV ultrahigh-ground-resolution image textures and vegetation indices
Abstract
Abstract When dealing with multiple growth stages, estimates of above-ground biomass (AGB) based on optical vegetation indices (VIs) are difficult for two reasons: (i) optical VIs saturate at medium-to-high canopy cover, and (ii) organs that grow vertically (e.g., biomass of reproductive organs and stems) are difficult to detect by canopy spectral VIs. Although several significant improvements have been made for estimating AGB by using narrow-band hyperspectral VIs, synthetic aperture radar, laser intensity direction and ranging, the crop surface model technique, and combinations thereof, applications of these new techniques have been limited by cost, availability, data-processing difficulties, and high dimensionality. The present study thus evaluates the use of ultrahigh-ground-resolution image textures, VIs, and combinations thereof to make multiple temporal estimates and maps of AGB covering three winter-wheat growth stages. The selected gray-tone spatial-dependence matrix-based image textures (e.g., variance, entropy, data range, homogeneity, second moment, dissimilarity, contrast, correlation) are calculated from 1-, 2-, 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-, 25-, and 30-cm-ground-resolution images acquired by using an inexpensive RGB sensor mounted on an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Optical-VI data were obtained by using a ground spectrometer to analyze UAV-acquired RGB images. The accuracy of AGB estimates based on optical VIs varies, with validation R2: 0.59–0.78, root mean square error (RMSE): 1.22–1.59 t/ha, and mean absolute error (MAE): 1.03–1.27 t/ha. The most accurate AGB estimate was obtained by combining image textures and VIs, which gave R2: 0.89, MAE: 0.67 t/ha, and RMSE: 0.82 t/ha. The results show that (i) the eight selected textures from ultrahigh-ground-resolution images were significantly related to AGB, (ii) the combined use of image textures from 1- to 30-cm-ground-resolution images and VIs can improve the accuracy of AGB estimates as compared with using only optical VIs or image textures alone; and (iii) high AGB values from winter-wheat reproductive growth stages can be accurately estimated by using this method; (iv) high estimates of winter-wheat AGB (8–14 t/ha) using the proposed combined method (DIS1, SE30, B460, B560, B670, EVI2 using MSR) show a 22.63% (nRMSE) improvement compared with using only spectral VIs (LCI, NDVI using MSR), and a 21.24% (nRMSE) improvement compared with using only image textures (COR1, DIS1, SE30, EN30 using MSR). Thus, the combined use of image textures and VIs can help improve estimates of AGB under conditions of high canopy coverage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Textural Features for Image Classification
Haralick, R. M., Shanmugam, K., & Dinstein, I. (1973) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1973.4309314 · Cited by 22,886
Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation
Tucker, C. J. (1979) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0 · Cited by 11,754
A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI)
Huete, A. R. (1988) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(88)90106-x · Cited by 7,948
Monitoring Vegetation Systems in the Great Plains with Erts
Rouse, J. W., Haas, R. H., Schell, J., & Deering, D. W. (1973) · NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) · Cited by 6,835
A modified soil adjusted vegetation index
Qi, J., Chehbouni, A., Huete, A. R., Kerr, Y. H., & Sorooshian, S. (1994) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(94)90134-1 · Cited by 3,379
Optimization of soil-adjusted vegetation indices
Rondeaux, G., Steven, M. D., & Baret, F. (1996) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(95)00186-7 · Cited by 2,920
Estimating Corn Leaf Chlorophyll Concentration from Leaf and Canopy Reflectance
Daughtry, C. (2000) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(00)00113-9 · Cited by 2,543
Novel algorithms for remote estimation of vegetation fraction
Gitelson, A. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Stark, R., & Rundquist, D. (2002) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(01)00289-9 · Cited by 2,183
Development of a two-band enhanced vegetation index without a blue band
JIANG, Z., HUETE, A., DIDAN, K., & MIURA, T. (2008) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2008.06.006 · Cited by 2,178
Metadata
- Authors
- Yue, J., Yang, G., Tian, Q., Feng, H., Xu, K., & Zhou, C.
- Venue
- ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 150
- Pages
- 226-244
- ISSN
- 0924-2716 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2920653747
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 20.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimate of winter-wheat above-ground biomass based on UAV ultrahigh-ground-resolution image textures and vegetation indices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.02.022
- The paper
- Yue, J., Yang, G., Tian, Q., Feng, H., Xu, K., & Zhou, C. (2019). Estimate of winter-wheat above-ground biomass based on UAV ultrahigh-ground-resolution image textures and vegetation indices. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.02.022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.