The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vegetation Index Weighted Canopy Volume Model (CVMVI) for soybean biomass estimation from Unmanned Aerial System-based RGB imagery
Abstract
Abstract Crop biomass estimation with high accuracy at low-cost is valuable for precision agriculture and high-throughput phenotyping. Recent technological advances in Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) significantly facilitate data acquisition at low-cost along with high spatial, spectral, and temporal resolution. The objective of this study was to explore the potential of UAS RGB imagery-derived spectral, structural, and volumetric information, as well as a proposed vegetation index weighted canopy volume model (CVMVI) for soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] aboveground biomass (AGB) estimation. RGB images were collected from low-cost UAS throughout the growing season at a field site near Columbia, Missouri, USA. High-density point clouds were produced using the structure from motion (SfM) technique through a photogrammetric workflow based on UAS stereo images. Two-dimensional (2D) canopy structure metrics such as canopy height (CH) and canopy projected basal area (BA), as well as three-dimensional (3D) volumetric metrics such as canopy volume model (CVM) were derived from photogrammetric point clouds. A variety of vegetation indices (VIs) were also extracted from RGB orthomosaics. Then, CVMVI, which combines canopy spectral and volumetric information, was proposed. Commonly used regression models were established based on the UAS-derived information and field- measured AGB with a leave-one-out cross-validation. The results show that: (1) In general, canopy 2D structural metrics CH and BA yielded higher correlation with AGB than VIs. (2) Three-dimensional metrics, such as CVM, that encompass both horizontal and vertical properties of canopy provided better estimates for AGB compared to 2D structural metrics (R2 = 0.849; RRMSE = 18.7%; MPSE = 20.8%). (3) Optimized CVMVI, which incorporates both canopy spectral and 3D volumetric information outperformed the other indices and metrics, and was a better predictor for AGB estimation (R2 = 0.893; RRMSE = 16.3%; MPSE = 19.5%). In addition, CVMVI showed equal prediction power for different genotypes, which indicates its potential for high-throughput soybean biomass estimation. Moreover, a CVMVI based univariate regression model yielded AGB predicting capability comparable to multivariate complex regression models such as stepwise multilinear regression (SMR) and partial least squares regression (PLSR) that incorporate multiple canopy spectral indices and structural metrics. Overall, this study reveals the potential of canopy spectral, structural and volumetric information, and their combination (i.e., CVMVI) for estimations of soybean AGB. CVMVI was shown to be simple but effective in estimating AGB, and could be applied for high-throughput phenotyping and precision agro-ecological applications and management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
Object recognition from local scale-invariant features
Lowe, D. G. (1999) · Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.1999.790410 · Cited by 16,472
Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation
Tucker, C. J. (1979) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0 · Cited by 11,754
Novel algorithms for remote estimation of vegetation fraction
Gitelson, A. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Stark, R., & Rundquist, D. (2002) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(01)00289-9 · Cited by 2,183
Comparison of Values of Pearson's and Spearman's Correlation Coefficients on the Same Sets of Data
Hauke, J., & Kossowski, T. (2011) · QUAGEO · doi:10.2478/v10117-011-0021-1 · Cited by 1,974
Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier
Araus, J. L., & Cairns, J. E. (2014) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2013.09.008 · Cited by 1,817
Color Indices for Weed Identification Under Various Soil, Residue, and Lighting Conditions
Woebbecke, D. M., Meyer, G. E., Bargen, K. V., & Mortensen, D. A. (1995) · Transactions of the ASAE · doi:10.13031/2013.27838 · Cited by 1,537
Bendig, J., Yu, K., Aasen, H., Bolten, A., Bennertz, S., Broscheit, J., Gnyp, M. L., & Bareth, G. (2015) · International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2015.02.012 · Cited by 1,196
Topographic structure from motion: a new development in photogrammetric measurement
Fonstad, M. A., Dietrich, J. T., Courville, B. C., Jensen, J. L., & Carbonneau, P. E. (2013) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.3366 · Cited by 1,126
Yang, G., Liu, J., Zhao, C., Li, Z., Huang, Y., Yu, H., Xu, B., Yang, X., Zhu, D., Zhang, X., et al. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01111 · Cited by 767
Metadata
- Authors
- Maimaitijiang, M., Sagan, V., Sidike, P., Maimaitiyiming, M., Hartling, S., Peterson, K. T., Maw, M. J. W., Shakoor, N., Mockler, T., & Fritschi, F. B.
- Venue
- ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 151
- Pages
- 27-41
- ISSN
- 0924-2716 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2921122163
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 13.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vegetation Index Weighted Canopy Volume Model (CVMVI) for soybean biomass estimation from Unmanned Aerial System-based RGB imagery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.03.003
- The paper
- Maimaitijiang, M., Sagan, V., Sidike, P., Maimaitiyiming, M., Hartling, S., Peterson, K. T., Maw, M. J. W., Shakoor, N., Mockler, T., & Fritschi, F. B. (2019). Vegetation Index Weighted Canopy Volume Model (CVMVI) for soybean biomass estimation from Unmanned Aerial System-based RGB imagery. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.03.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.