The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Conservation tillage impacts on soil, crop and the environment
Open accessAbstract
There is an urgent need to match food production with increasing world population through identification of sustainable land management strategies. However, the struggle to achieve food security should be carried out keeping in mind the soil where the crops are grown and the environment in which the living things survive. Conservation agriculture (CA), practising agriculture in such a way so as to cause minimum damage to the environment, is being advocated at a large scale world-wide. Conservation tillage, the most important aspect of CA, is thought to take care of the soil health, plant growth and the environment. This paper aims to review the work done on conservation tillage in different agro-ecological regions so as to understand its impact from the perspectives of the soil, the crop and the environment. Research reports have identified several benefits of conservation tillage over conventional tillage (CT) with respect to soil physical, chemical and biological properties as well as crop yields. Not less than 25% of the greenhouse gas effluxes to the atmosphere are attributed to agriculture. Processes of climate change mitigation and adaptation found zero tillage (ZT) to be the most environmental friendly among different tillage techniques. Therefore, conservation tillage involving ZT and minimum tillage which has potential to break the surface compact zone in soil with reduced soil disturbance offers to lead to a better soil environment and crop yield with minimal impact on the environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
How does tillage intensity affect soil organic carbon? A systematic review
Haddaway, N. R., Hedlund, K., Jackson, L. E., Kätterer, T., Lugato, E., Thomsen, I. K., Jørgensen, H. B., & Isberg, P.-E. (2017) · Environmental Evidence · doi:10.1186/s13750-017-0108-9 · Cited by 485
Sustainability issues on rice–wheat cropping system
Bhatt, R., Kukal, S. S., Busari, M. A., Arora, S., & Yadav, M. (2016) · International Soil and Water Conservation Research · doi:10.1016/j.iswcr.2015.12.001 · Cited by 339
Self-citationConservation agriculture as a sustainable system for soil health: a review
Cárceles Rodríguez, B., Durán-Zuazo, V. H., Soriano Rodríguez, M., García-Tejero, I. F., Gálvez Ruiz, B., & Cuadros Tavira, S. (2022) · Soil Systems · doi:10.3390/soilsystems6040087 · Cited by 337
Management of Crop Residues for Improving Input Use Efficiency and Agricultural Sustainability
Sarkar, S., Skalicky, M., Hossain, A., Brestic, M., Saha, S., Garai, S., Ray, K., & Brahmachari, K. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12239808 · Cited by 257
Meeting global land restoration and protection targets: What would the world look like in 2050?
Wolff, S., Schrammeijer, E. A., Schulp, C. J. E., & Verburg, P. H. (2018) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.08.002 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Busari, M. A., Kukal, S. S., Kaur, A., Bhatt, R., & Dulazi, A. A.
- Venue
- International Soil and Water Conservation Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 119-129
- ISSN
- 2095-6339 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2183093624
- Cited by
- 858
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 41.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conservation tillage impacts on soil, crop and the environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.iswcr.2015.05.002
- The paper
- Busari, M. A., Kukal, S. S., Kaur, A., Bhatt, R., & Dulazi, A. A. (2015). Conservation tillage impacts on soil, crop and the environment. International Soil and Water Conservation Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2015.05.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.