Cited by 101Schizophrenia research and treatmentBipolar Disorder and TreatmentPharmaceutical studies and practices

Double-Blind Maintenance Safety and Effectiveness Findings From the Treatment of Early-Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum (TEOSS) Study

Open access
Findling, Robert L., Johnson, Jacqueline L., McClellan, Jon, Frazier, Jean A., Vitiello, Benedetto, Hamer, Robert M., Lieberman, Jeffrey A., Ritz, Louise +9 more·2010·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To examine the long-term safety and efficacy of three antipsychotics in early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Method Patients (8 to 19 years old) who had improved during an 8-week, randomized, double-blind acute trial of olanzapine, risperidone, or molindone (plus benztropine) were eligible to continue on the same medication for up to 44 additional weeks under double-blind conditions. Adjunctive medications were allowed according to defined algorithms. Standardized symptom, safety, and functional assessments were conducted every 4 weeks. Results Of the 116 youths randomized in the acute trial, 54 entered maintenance treatment (molindone, n = 20; olanzapine, n = 13; risperidone, n = 21). Fourteen (26%) completed 44 weeks of treatment. Adverse effects (n = 15), inadequate efficacy (n = 14), or study nonadherence (n = 8) were the most common reasons for discontinuation. The three treatment arms did not significantly differ in symptom decrease or time to discontinuation. Akathisia was more common with molindone and elevated prolactin concentrations more common with risperidone. Although weight gain and metabolic adverse events had occurred more often with olanzapine and risperidone during the acute trial, no significant between-drug differences emerged in most of these parameters during maintenance treatment. Conclusions Only 12% of youths with early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders continued on their originally randomized treatment at 52 weeks. No agent demonstrated superior efficacy, and all were associated with side effects, including weight gain. Improved treatments are needed for early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Clinical trial registry information-Treatment of Schizophrenia and Related Disorders in Children and Adolescents; URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, unique identifier: NCT00053703.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.03.013

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The clinical indication for antipsychotics has been also extended to conduct disorders, although with only moderate efficacy rates.

    “The clinical indication for antipsychotics has been also extended to conduct disorders, although with only moderate efficacy rates (31,32).”

    From Pediatric psychopharmacology: Too much or too little? (2013) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Introduction reports that approximately 50% of youths with early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders responded to their initially assigned antipsychotic, which is consistent with a moderate response rate. The paper does not address an extension of antipsychotic indications to conduct disorders or report efficacy for that condition (searched: conduct disorder, indication, efficacy). (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [1]American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with schizophrenia J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001 40 7 Suppl 4S 23S 11434484
  2. [2]Frazier JA McClellan J Findling RL Treatment of Early-Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum disorders (TEOSS): demographic and clinical characteristics J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2007 46 8 979 988 17667477
  3. [3]Sikich L Frazier JA McClellan J Double-blind comparison of first- and second-generation antipsychotics in early-onset schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: findings from the Treatment of Early-Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders (TEOSS) study Am J Psychiatry 2008 165 11 1420 1431 PMC12860492 18794207
  4. [4]Johnsen E Jørgensen HA Effectiveness of second generation antipsychotics: A systematic review of randomized trials BMC Psychiatry 2008 8 31 18439263 PMC2386457
  5. [5]McClellan J Sikich L Findling RL Treatment of Early-Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders (TEOSS): rationale, design, and methods J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2007 46 8 969 978 17667476
  6. [6]Kay SR Fiszbein A Opler LA The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia Schizophr Bull 1987 13 2 262 276 3616518
  7. [7]National Institute of Mental Health Special feature: rating scales and assessment instruments for use in pediatric psychopharmacology research Psychopharmacol Bull 1985 21 4 765 770 3911249
  8. [8]Overall JE Pfefferbaum B The brief psychiatric rating scale for children Psychopharmacol Bull 1982 18 2 10 16 7111598
  9. [11]Simpson GM Angus JWS A rating scale for extrapyramidal effects Acta Psychiatr Scand 1970 212 111 199 4917967
  10. [12]Barnes TR A rating scale for drug-induced akathisia Br J Psychiatry 1989 154 672 676 2574607
  11. [14]Lieberman JA Stroup TS McEvoy JP Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) Investigators. Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia N Engl J Med 2005 353 12 1209 1223 16172203
  12. [15]Jones PB Barnes TR Davies L Randomized controlled trial of the effect on Quality of Life of second- vs first-generation antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: Cost Utility of the Latest Antipsychotic Drugs in Schizophrenia Study (CUtLASS 1) Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006 63 10 1079 1087 17015810
  13. [16]Kahn RS Fleischhacker WW Boter H EUFEST study group Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in first-episode schizophrenia and schizophreniform disorder: an open randomised clinical trial Lancet 2008 371 9618 1085 1097 18374841

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Findling, R. L., Johnson, J. L., McClellan, J., Frazier, J. A., Vitiello, B., Hamer, R. M., Lieberman, J. A., Ritz, L., McNamara, N. K., Lingler, J., Hlastala, S., Pierson, L., Puglia, M., Maloney, A. E., Kaufman, E. M., Noyes, N., & Sikich, L.
Affiliations
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Cambridge Health Alliance (US)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (US)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (US)
  • Seattle Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Findling, Robert L.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
49
Issue
6
Pages
583-594
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008822971
Cited by
101
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 8
FWCI
8.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
  • CeNeRx
  • University of Washington (RR-00037)
  • University of Massachusetts
  • Case Western Reserve University (OH 44106)
  • Maine Medical Center Research Institute
  • Seattle Children's Research Institute
  • Supernus Pharmaceuticals
  • Otsuka America
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • National Institutes of Health (RR-00046)
  • Genentech
  • Allergan
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U01MH062726, MH-61355, K23 MH70570, K23MH01802, MH-61528, U01MH061355, K23MH070570, K23MH001802, U01MH061528, U01MH061464, MH-61464, MH-62726)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01 RR00046, U54 RR 024383, M01-RR 00037, M01RR000046, M01RR000037)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
maintenance therapy, antipsychotic drugs, olanzapine, risperidone, molindone, benztropine, treatment discontinuation, akathisia, prolactin elevation, weight gain, metabolic side effects, treatment safety
MeSH terms
Olanzapine, Adolescent, Benzodiazepines, Child, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Long-Term Care, Male, Molindone, Prolactin, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotic Disorders, Psychotropic Drugs, Risk Factors, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Weight Gain, Akathisia, Drug-Induced, Risperidone, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review