Cited by 3Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Drs. Gilboa-Schechtman et al. reply

Gilboa-Schechtman, Eva, Shafran, Naama, Foa, Edna B.·2011·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.03.003

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Gilboa-Schechtman, E., Shafran, N., & Foa, E. B.
Affiliations
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
50
Issue
5
Pages
522-524
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005116237
Cited by
3
References
14
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
prolonged exposure, post-traumatic stress disorder, trauma survivors, randomized controlled trial methodology, child and adolescent psychiatry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review