Striatum-Based Circuitry of Adolescent Depression and Anhedonia
Open accessAbstract
Objective Striatum-based circuits have been implicated in both major depressive disorder (MDD) and anhedonia, a symptom that reflects deficits of reward processing. Yet adolescents with MDD often exhibit a wide range of anhedonia severity. Addressing this clinical phenomenon, we aimed to use intrinsic functional connectivity (iFC) to study striatum-based circuitry in relation to categorical diagnosis of MDD and anhedonia severity.Method A total of 21 psychotropic medication-free adolescents with MDD and 21 healthy controls (HC), group-matched for age and sex, underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imagining (fMRI) scans. Voxelwise maps indicating correlation strengths of spontaneous blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) signals among 6 bilateral striatal seeds (dorsal caudate, ventral caudate, nucleus accumbens, dorsal-rostral putamen, dorsal-caudal putamen, ventral-rostral putamen) and the remaining brain regions were compared between groups. Relationships between striatal iFC and severity of MDD and anhedonia were examined in the MDD group. Analyses were corrected for multiple comparisons.Results Adolescents with MDD manifested increased iFC between all striatal regions bilaterally and the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), as well as between the right ventral caudate and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). MDD severity was associated with iFC between the striatum and midline structures including the precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex, and dmPFC. However, distinct striatal iFC patterns involving the pregenual ACC, subgenual ACC, supplementary motor area, and supramarginal gyrus were associated with anhedonia severity.Conclusions Although MDD diagnosis and severity were related to striatal networks involving midline cortical structures, distinct circuits within the reward system were associated with anhedonia. Findings support the incorporation of both categorical and dimensional approaches in neuropsychiatric research.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Increased rsFC between dmPFC and various striatal regions has been reported in resting state studies.
“Of relevance, disrupted coupling within reward-related corticostriatal pathways has emerged also from resting state studies, with reports of increased rsFC between (1) vlPFC and dorsal striatum [135], and (2) dmPFC and various striatal regions [136].”
From Prefrontal cortex and depression (2022) · cites this paper as [136]
The orbitofrontal cortex is involved in learning, prediction, and decision-making for emotional and reward-related behaviors and is important in the regulation of behavioral impulsivity and response inhibition.
“The orbitofrontal cortex is involved in learning, prediction, and decision-making for emotional and reward-related behaviors and is important in the regulation of behavioral impulsivity and response inhibition [60].”
From Mapping neurophysiological subtypes of major depressive disorder using normative models of the functional connectome (2023) · cites this paper as [60]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 118 · Cited by 222
- Authors
- Gabbay, V., Ely, B. A., Li, Q., Bangaru, S. D., Panzer, A. M., Alonso, C. M., Castellanos, F. X., & Milham, M. P.
- Affiliations
- Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- Child Mind Institute (US)
- NYU Langone Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gabbay, Vilma
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-06
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 628-641.e13
- ISSN
- 0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3762469
- OpenAlex
- W2140798832
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 118
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 7
- FWCI
- 9.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH075895, R01MH095807, MH077072, MH077072-03S1, K23MH077072, R01MH075895, MH 095807)
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R21AT002395, R21AT004576, AT004576, AT002395)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- adolescent depression, anhedonia, striatum, intrinsic functional connectivity, reward processing, dorsal caudate, nucleus accumbens, putamen, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex, supplementary motor area, supramarginal gyrus, depression severity
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Corpus Striatum, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Severity of Illness Index, Young Adult, Anhedonia, Connectome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review