Genetic Associations Between the Symptoms of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Emotional Lability in Child and Adolescent Twins
Open accessAbstract
Objective Emotional lability is recognized as an associated feature of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, the degree of phenotypic and etiologic overlap between emotional lability and the ADHD dimensions of hyperactivity-impulsivity and inattention remains unclear. The present study examines these associations in a large, community twin sample.Method Structural equation models were fit to data from 1,920 child and adolescent twin pairs (age range, 5-18 years). Symptoms of hyperactivity-impulsivity (HI) and inattention (IA) were assessed using a modified version of the DuPaul rating scale, completed by parents. Symptoms of emotional lability (EL) were assessed using the parent-rated Conners 10-item scale.Results There were moderate to strong phenotypic correlations between HI, IA, and EL. Multivariate twin modeling revealed that a common pathway model best accounted for the covariance among these dimensions, represented by a highly heritable latent factor. Ad hoc analyses confirmed that all additive genetic influences on HI, IA, and EL were shared, and identified a significantly stronger association of EL with the latent ADHD factor in older than in younger individuals.Conclusions Emotional lability was phenotypically and genetically associated with hyperactivity-impulsivity and inattention in children and adolescents. The finding that a single, heritable, latent factor accounted for covariation among these phenotypes indicates that their co-occurrence is primarily the result of overlapping genetic effects. These data support the hypothesis that emotional lability is etiologically relevant to the core ADHD phenotype, and that it should be targeted in assessment and treatment in clinical practice.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Shared genetic factors account for the co-occurrence of ADHD with emotional dysregulation.
“Shared genetic factors also account for the co-occurrence of ADHD with emotional d ysregulation - an independent source of impairment in ADHD 30,31 .”
From Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (2015) · cites this paper as [30]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68 · Cited by 84
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- [1]1. Association AP. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
- [2]2. Barkley RA. Deficient emotional self-regulation: a core component of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J ADHD Relat Disord. 2010;1:5-37.
- [49]49. Muth en LK, Muth en BO. Mplus User's Guide (Sixth Edition). Los Angeles, CA: Muth en and Muth en; 1998-2011.
- [52]52. Neale MC, Boker SM, Xie G, Maes HH. Mx: Statistical Modeling: VCU Box 900126, Richmond, VA 23298: Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University. 7th Edition.; 2006.
- [69]69. Wood AC, Rijsdijk F, Asherson P, Kuntsi J. Hyperactive- impulsive symptom scores and oppositional behaviours reflect alternate manifestations of a single liability. Behav Genet. 2009; 39:447-460.
- Authors
- Merwood, A., Chen, W., Rijsdijk, F., Skirrow, C., Larsson, H., Thapar, A., Kuntsi, J., & Asherson, P.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Cardiff University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Merwood, Andrew
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209-220.e4
- ISSN
- 0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027005399
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 5.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Action Medical Research
- King's College London
- Vifor Pharma
- Medical Research Council (MR/L010305/1)
- Cilag
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Keywords
- attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, emotional lability, hyperactivity/impulsivity, inattention, genetic association, heritability, shared genetic effects, phenotypic covariance, latent factor models
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Affective Symptoms, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child, Preschool, Diseases in Twins, Female, Humans, Male, Phenotype, Genetic Predisposition to Disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review