Cited by 27Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Treatment and Access

A longitudinal follow-up study examining adolescent depressive symptoms as a function of prior anxiety treatment

Open access
Silk, Jennifer S., Price, Rebecca B., Rosen, Dana, Ryan, Neal D., Forbes, Erika E., Siegle, Greg J., Dahl, Ronald E., McMakin, Dana L. +2 more·2019·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective Children who are fearful and anxious are at heightened risk for developing depression in adolescence. Treating anxiety disorders in pre-/early adolescence may be one mechanism through which depressive symptoms later in adolescence can be prevented. We hypothesized that anxious youth who responded positively to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for anxiety would show reduced onset of depressive symptoms 2 years later compared to treatment nonresponders, and that this effect would be specific to youth treated with CBT compared to an active supportive comparison treatment.Method Participants were 80 adolescents ages 11 to 17 years who had previously completed a randomized trial comparing predictors of treatment response to CBT and child-centered therapy (CCT). Youth met DSM-IV criteria for generalized, separation, and/or social anxiety disorder at the time of treatment. The present study was a prospective naturalistic 2-year follow-up examining trajectories toward depression, in which participants were reassessed for depressive symptoms 2 years after anxiety treatment. Treatment response was defined as a 35% reduction in independent evaluator-rated anxiety severity on the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale after treatment.Results As hypothesized, lower levels of depressive symptoms were observed in anxious youth who responded to CBT for anxiety (β = -0.807, p = .004) but not CCT (β = 0.254, p = .505). Sensitivity analyses showed that the effects were driven by girls.Conclusion Findings suggest that CBT for anxiety is a promising approach to preventing adolescent depressive symptomatology, especially among girls. The results highlight the need for better early screening for anxiety and better dissemination of CBT programs targeting anxiety in youth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.10.012

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rates of depression are lower than would be anticipated in a high-risk sample due to the fact that participants previously received treatment for anxiety, which may have secondary effects on depressive symptoms.

    “We suspect that rates of depression are lower than would be anticipated in a high-risk sample due to the fact that participants previously received treatment for anxiety, which may have secondary effects on depressive symptoms (Silk et al., 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 57 · Cited by 27

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Brent D, Rao U, Flynn C, Moreci P. Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age ChildrenÀPresent and Lifetime Version (K- SADSPL): initial reliability and validity data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997; 36:980-987.

Authors
Silk, J. S., Price, R. B., Rosen, D., Ryan, N. D., Forbes, E. E., Siegle, G. J., Dahl, R. E., McMakin, D. L., Kendall, P. C., & Ladouceur, C. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Florida International University (US)
  • Temple University (US)
Corresponding author
Silk, Jennifer S.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
359-367
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2909250560
Cited by
27
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6
FWCI
5.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH091327)
  • Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh (UL1 RR024153)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
adolescent depression, depressive symptoms, anxiety disorders, cognitive behavioral therapy, child-centered therapy, treatment response, depression prevention, generalized anxiety disorder, separation anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, sex differences, longitudinal follow-up
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Depression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Linear Models, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review