Cited by 60Psychometric Methodologies and TestingChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Research Topics

Computerized Adaptive Tests for Rapid and Accurate Assessment of Psychopathology Dimensions in Youth

Open access
Gibbons, Robert D., Kupfer, David J., Frank, Ellen, Lahey, Benjamin B., George-Milford, Brandie A., Biernesser, Candice L., Porta, Giovanna, Moore, Tara L. +2 more·2020·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective At least half of youths with mental disorders are unrecognized and untreated. Rapid, accurate assessment of child mental disorders could facilitate identification and referral and potentially reduce the occurrence of functional disability that stems from early-onset mental disorders.Method Computerized adaptive tests (CATs) based on multidimensional item response theory were developed for depression, anxiety, mania/hypomania, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and suicidality, based on parent and child ratings of 1,060 items each. In phase 1, CATs were developed from 801 participants. In phase 2, predictive, discriminant, and convergent validity were tested against semi-structured research interviews for diagnoses and suicidality in 497 patients and 104 healthy controls. Overall strength of association was determined by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).Results The child and parent independently completed the Kiddie-Computerized Adaptive Tests (K-CATs) in a median time of 7.56 and 5.03 minutes, respectively, with an average of 7 items per domain. The K-CATs accurately captured the presence of diagnoses (AUCs from 0.83 for generalized anxiety disorder to 0.92 for major depressive disorder) and suicidal ideation (AUC = 0.996). Strong correlations with extant measures were found (r ≥ 0.60). Test-retest reliability averaged r = 0.80.Conclusion These K-CATs provide a new approach to child psychopathology screening and measurement. Testing can be completed by child and parent in less than 8 minutes and yields results that are highly convergent with much more time-consuming structured clinical interviews and dimensional severity assessment and measurement. Testing of the implementation of the K-CAT is now indicated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.08.009

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Predictive validity of both the adult and paediatric CATs for assessment of suicidal risk have yet to be reported.

    “However, predictive validity of both the adult and paediatric CATs for assessment of suicidal risk have yet to be reported 218,219 .”

    From Suicide and suicide risk (2019) · cites this paper as [219]

    The Discussion (page not provided) says the pediatric K-CAT-SS’s predictive validity for suicidal behavior is unknown. It does not establish the same point for adult CATs, and the Results (Phase 2; page not provided) report validation for detecting current suicidal ideation, so the broader claim about suicidal-risk assessment needs qualification. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A CAT for assessing suicidal ideation or behavior has been developed for children and adolescents that shows high convergent and discriminative validity.

    “Similarly, a CAT for assessing suicidal ideation or behavior has been developed for children and adolescents that shows high convergent and discriminative validity.”

    From Suicide and suicide risk (2019) · cites this paper as [219]

    The Methods describe a youth suicidality CAT, and the Results (Phase 2; page unavailable) report strong discrimination of current suicidal ideation against a structured clinical interview (AUC 0.95). The claim overextends that finding to suicidal behavior: the Results say there were too few current behavior events to analyze, and the Discussion says its concurrent and predictive validity for suicidal behavior is unknown. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 60

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]Nathan PI, Gorman JM (eds.) Treatments That Work, Oxford University Press, 2015

Authors
Gibbons, R. D., Kupfer, D. J., Frank, E., Lahey, B. B., George-Milford, B. A., Biernesser, C. L., Porta, G., Moore, T. L., Kim, J. B., & Brent, D. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • UPMC Health System (US)
Corresponding author
Gibbons, Robert D.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
59
Issue
11
Pages
1264-1273
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2971069371
Cited by
60
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
computerized adaptive testing, child psychopathology, item response theory, depression, anxiety, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, suicidality, suicidal ideation, psychometric validation, test-retest reliability, rapid screening
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Psychopathology, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review