Big Data Approach to Characterize Restricted and Repetitive Behaviors in Autism
Open accessAbstract
Objective Despite being a core diagnostic feature of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), demographic, developmental and clinical correlates of restricted and repetitive behaviors and interests (RRB) remain poorly characterized. This study aimed to utilize the largest available RRB data set to date to provide a comprehensive characterization of how distinct RRB domains vary according to a range of individual characteristics.Method Data were obtained from 17,581 children and adolescents with ASD (mean age= 8.24 years, SD age= 4.06) from the Simons Foundation Powering Autism Research for Knowledge cohort. Caregivers completed the Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised questionnaire as a measure of repetitive motor behaviors, self-injurious behaviors, compulsions, insistence on sameness, and circumscribed interests RRB domains. Caregivers also provided information on children's cognitive functioning, language ability, and social and communication impairments.Results Male sex was associated with higher severity of repetitive motor behaviors and restricted interests and with lower severity of compulsions and self-injurious behaviors; no sex differences were found for the insistence on sameness domain. Although repetitive motor behaviors showed a mostly linear (negative) association with age, other RRB domains showed more complex and nonlinear pattern of associations. Higher severity of social and communication impairments provided significant independent contribution in predicting higher severity of all RRB domains at the p < .001 level; however, these effects were small (d < 0.25). The strongest of these effects was observed for insistence on sameness (d = 0.24), followed by repetitive motor behaviors (d = 0.21), compulsions (d = 0.17), restricted interests (d = 0.14), and self-injurious behaviors (d = 0.12).Conclusion Findings reported here provide further evidence that RRB subdomains show a somewhat distinct pattern of associations with demographic, developmental, and clinical variables, with a key implication that separate consideration of these domains can help to facilitate efforts to understand diverse ASD etiology and to inform the design of effective interventions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
On average, autistic males and females have similar levels of insistence on sameness; autistic males are more likely to show repetitive motor behaviours and speech and circumscribed interests, whereas autistic females are more likely to experience compulsions and/or self-injurious behaviours.
“On average, autistic males and females have similar levels of insistence on sameness; autistic males are more likely to show repetitive motor behaviours and speech, and circumscribed interests, whereas autistic females are more likely to experience compulsions and/or self-injurious behaviours115–119.”
From Sex and gender in neurodevelopmental conditions (2023) · cites this paper as [116]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 53
- Authors
- Uljarević, M., Frazier, T. W., Jo, B., Billingham, W. D., Cooper, M. N., Youngstrom, E. A., Scahill, L., & Hardan, A. Y.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- John Carroll University (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Emory University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Uljarević, Mirko
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-03
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 446-457
- ISSN
- 0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC13687538
- OpenAlex
- W3193408653
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 5.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council (DE180100632)
- National Institute of Mental Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, restricted and repetitive behaviors, repetitive motor behavior, self-harm, compulsive behavior, insistence on sameness, circumscribed interests, sex differences, age differences, Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised, ASD etiology
- MeSH terms
- Autism Spectrum Disorder, Big Data, Adolescent, Autistic Disorder, Child, Cognition, Humans, Male
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review