Cited by 120Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer StudiesOptical Coherence Tomography ApplicationsCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management

Optical coherence tomography for the characterization of basal cell carcinoma in vivo: A pilot study

Olmedo, Jesse M., Warschaw, Karen E., Schmitt, Joseph M., Swanson, David L.·2006·Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Abstract

Background Optical coherence tomography combines principles of ultrasonography and optical interferometry to provide real-time cross-sectional images of subsurface microstructure of tissue in vivo.Objective The purpose of this pilot study was to define and characterize basal cell carcinoma by using optical coherence tomography.Methods Twenty-three patients with 49 lesions clinically suggestive of superficial basal cell carcinoma were recruited. Optical coherence tomography was used to characterize the features of the pearly papules in real time and in vivo. Shave biopsy and light microscopic images were compared with images from optical coherence tomography.Results Basal cell carcinoma was identified in 27 patients; all 27 had optical coherence tomographic images for comparison. Seven images were uninterpretable, probably because of technical problems. Of the remainder, 20 sites matched the histologic features seen on light microscopy, with excellent correlation between optical coherence tomographic images and histopathologic features of superficial, nodular, micronodular and infiltrative basal cell carcinomas.Limitations This study was limited by the small number of patients examined. Also, as this study was not designed as an intent-to-diagnose study, the actual predictive value of optical coherence tomography technology remains unproven.Conclusions Optical coherence tomography technology has potential for the diagnosis and histopathologic characterization of basal cell cancer. Additional studies to determine any practical role for optical coherence tomography are indicated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.03.013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 120

Authors
Olmedo, J. M., Warschaw, K. E., Schmitt, J. M., & Swanson, D. L.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-09
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
408-412
ISSN
0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990403432
Cited by
120
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
7.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Optical Coherence Tomography Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Keywords
optical coherence tomography, basal cell carcinoma, in vivo imaging, histopathological correlation, superficial basal cell carcinoma, nodular basal cell carcinoma, micronodular basal cell carcinoma, infiltrative basal cell carcinoma, non-invasive diagnosis
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Basal Cell Carcinoma, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Skin Neoplasms, Tomography, Optical Coherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review