The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Systematic skin cancer screening in Northern Germany
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of skin cancer is increasing worldwide. For decades, opportunistic melanoma screening has been carried out to respond to this burden. However, despite potential positive effects such as reduced morbidity and mortality, there is still a lack of evidence for feasibility and effectiveness of organized skin cancer screening. OBJECTIVE The main aim of the project was to evaluate the feasibility of systematic skin cancer screening. METHODS In 2003, the Association of Dermatological Prevention was contracted to implement the population-based SCREEN project (Skin Cancer Research to Provide Evidence for Effectiveness of Screening in Northern Germany) in the German state of Schleswig-Holstein. A two-step program addressing malignant melanoma and nonmelanocytic skin cancer was implemented. Citizens (aged ≥ 20 years) with statutory health insurance were eligible for a standardized whole-body examination during the 12-month study period. Cancer registry and mortality data were used to assess first effects. RESULTS Of 1.88 million eligible citizens, 360,288 participated in SCREEN. The overall population-based participation rate was 19%. A total of 3103 malignant skin tumors were found. On the population level, invasive melanoma incidence increased by 34% during SCREEN. Five years after SCREEN a substantial decrease in melanoma mortality was seen (men: observed 0.79/100,000 and expected 2.00/100,000; women: observed 0.66/100,000 and expected 1.30/100,000). LIMITATIONS Because of political reasons (resistance as well as lack of support from major German health care stakeholders), it was not possible to conduct a randomized controlled trial. CONCLUSIONS The project showed that large-scale systematic skin cancer screening is feasible and has the potential to reduce skin cancer burden, including mortality. Based on the results of SCREEN, a national statutory skin cancer early detection program was implemented in Germany in 2008.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Long, G. V., Swetter, S. M., Menzies, A. M., Gershenwald, J. E., & Scolyer, R. A. (2023) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00821-8 · Cited by 746
Screening for Skin Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
US Preventive Services Task Force, Bibbins-Domingo, K., Grossman, D. C., Curry, S. J., Davidson, K. W., Ebell, M., Epling, J. W., García, F. A. R., Gillman, M. W., Kemper, A. R., et al. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.8465 · Cited by 322
Mobile teledermatology for skin cancer screening: A diagnostic accuracy study
Markun, S., Scherz, N., Rosemann, T., Tandjung, R., & Braun, R. P. (2017) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000006278 · Cited by 58
Rat, C., Quereux, G., Monegier du Sorbier, M., Gaultier, A., Bonnaud-Antignac, A., Khammari, A., Dreno, B., & Nguyen, J. M. (2014) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.03.029 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Breitbart, E. W., Waldmann, A., Nolte, S., Capellaro, M., Greinert, R., Volkmer, B., & Katalinic, A.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 201-211
- ISSN
- 0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072367618
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic skin cancer screening in Northern Germany. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.016
- The paper
- Breitbart, E. W., Waldmann, A., Nolte, S., Capellaro, M., Greinert, R., Volkmer, B., & Katalinic, A. (2012). Systematic skin cancer screening in Northern Germany. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.