Cited by 106Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer StudiesCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementDermatologic Treatments and Research

The safety of Mohs surgery: a prospective multicenter cohort study

Merritt, Bradley G., Lee, Nicole Y., Brodland, David G., Zitelli, John A., Cook, Joel·2012·Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Abstract

Background Complications associated with Mohs surgery have been evaluated by single-surgeon studies. While these studies provide evidence for the safety of the procedure, prospective, multicenter studies afford a higher level of clinical evidence and establish further the safety profile of Mohs surgery in the ambulatory setting.Objective This study was designed to prospectively evaluate major and minor complications as well as postoperative pain associated with Mohs surgery.Methods A multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted evaluating the rate of major and minor complications as well as postoperative pain associated with the treatment of skin cancer using Mohs surgery in 1550 patients with 1792 tumors. Follow-up was obtained in 1709 of the 1792 tumors treated (95.3%).Results No major complications occurred during Mohs surgery or reconstruction. A total of 44 (2.6%) minor primary postoperative complications occurred during the study. On a scale from 0 to 10, the average peak postoperative pain level was 1.99.Limitations Limitations of the study include the variability of practice patterns across practice sites as well as the 4.7% of patients lost to follow-up.Conclusion Mohs surgery is performed with a high degree of safety and is well tolerated by patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.05.041

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The performance of the procedures with local anesthesia and vasoconstrictors (100 cases) in the outpatient setting (95 cases) did not show an increase in risks or complications for the patients.

    “The performance of the procedures with local anesthesia and vasoconstrictors (100 cases) in the outpatient setting (95 cases) did not show an increase in risks or complications for the patients, data that have been well established in the literature.17, 18, 19, 20, 21”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15 · Cited by 106

Authors
Merritt, B. G., Lee, N. Y., Brodland, D. G., Zitelli, J. A., & Cook, J.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Merritt, Bradley G.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
67
Issue
6
Pages
1302-1309
ISSN
0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091895122
Cited by
106
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Keywords
Mohs micrographic surgery, surgical complications, postoperative pain, skin cancer, surgical reconstruction, outpatient surgery
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Pain, Postoperative, Postoperative Pain, Postoperative Complications, Prospective Studies, Skin Neoplasms, Cohort Studies, Mohs Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review