Global mortality from conditions with skin manifestations
Abstract
Background Global Burden of Disease Study is a research database containing systematically compiled information from vital statistics and epidemiologic literature to inform research, public policy, and resource allocation.Objective We sought to compare mortality among conditions with skin manifestations in 50 developed and 137 developing countries from 1990 to 2010.Methods This was a cross-sectional study to calculate mean age-standardized mortality (per 100,000 persons) across countries for 10 disease categories with skin manifestations. We compared differences in mortality from these disorders by time period (year 1990 vs year 2010) and by developing versus developed country status.Results Melanoma death rates were 5.6 and 4.7 times greater in developed compared with developing countries in 1990 and 2010, respectively. Measles death rates in 1990 and 2010 were 345 and 197 times greater in developing countries, and corresponding syphilis death rates were 33 and 45 times greater.Limitations Inability to adjust for patient-, provider-, and geographic-level confounders may limit the accuracy and generalizability of these results.Conclusion The mortality burden from skin-related conditions differs between developing and developed countries, with the greatest differences observed for melanoma, measles, and syphilis. These results may help prioritize and optimize efforts to prevent and treat these disorders.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In 2010, melanoma mortality was 4.7 times higher in resource-rich countries than in resource-poor countries.
“Mortality due to melanoma was found to be 4.7 times higher in resource-rich countries compared to resource-poor in 2010”
From Global Burden of Skin Disease: Inequities and Innovations (2017) · cites this paper as [7]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 31
- Authors
- Boyers, L. N., Karimkhani, C., Naghavi, M., Sherwood, D., Margolis, D. J., Hay, R. J., Williams, H. C., Naldi, L., Coffeng, L. E., Weinstock, M. A., Dunnick, C. A., Pederson, H., Vos, T., & Dellavalle, R. P.
- Affiliations
- Georgetown University (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- National Health Service (GB)
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII (IT)
- Brown University (US)
- United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
- University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dellavalle, Robert P.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1137-1143.e17
- ISSN
- 0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974528323
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 9.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Global Health and Epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
- Keywords
- skin diseases, mortality, melanoma, measles, syphilis, developing countries, developed countries, global burden of disease, age-standardized mortality rates, mortality trends
- MeSH terms
- Carcinoma, Basal Cell, Basal Cell Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Chickenpox, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dengue, Developing Countries, Humans, Measles, Melanoma, Skin Neoplasms, Syphilis, Global Health, Age Distribution, Developed Countries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review