Cited by 11Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealthcare Systems and TechnologyDigital Imaging in Medicine

The nuts and bolts of teledermatology: Preventing fragmented care

Rubin, Courtney B., Kovarik, Carrie L.·2015·Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.06.046

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rubin, C. B., & Kovarik, C. L.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Kovarik, Carrie L.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
73
Issue
5
Pages
886-888
ISSN
0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2168322691
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Digital Imaging in Medicine
Keywords
teledermatology, telemedicine, care fragmentation, acne, doxycycline, electronic prescribing, antibiotic prescribing, dermatology practice management
MeSH terms
Continuity of Patient Care, Dermatology, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, United States, Telemedicine, Privacy, Internet, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review