Cited by 84Skin Protection and Agingmelanin and skin pigmentationPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities

The impact of oral Polypodium leucotomos extract on ultraviolet B response: A human clinical study

Open access
Kohli, Indermeet, Shafi, Rubina, Isedeh, Prescilia, Griffith, James L., Al-Jamal, Mohammed S., Silpa-archa, Narumol, Jackson, Bradford, Athar, Mohammed +4 more·2017·Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Abstract

Background There is a rationale for adding systemic photoprotective agents to the current photoprotection regimen.Objective This study was designed to objectively evaluate the molecular and photobiologic effects of oral administration of Polypodium leucotomos extract (PLE).Methods In all, 22 subjects with Fitzpatrick skin phototype I to III were enrolled. On day 1, subjects were irradiated with visible light, ultraviolet (UV) A1, and UVB (using 308-nm excimer laser). Evaluation was done immediately and 24 hours after irradiation. On days 3 and 4, irradiation and evaluation process was repeated after ingestion of PLE.Results Clinical assessments and colorimetry data showed a decrease in UVB-induced changes in 17 of 22 subjects post-PLE administration; histology findings demonstrated such a decrease in all 22 subjects.Limitations Only 2 doses of PLE were given. Furthermore, subjects with skin phototypes I to III only were studied.Conclusion The results suggest that PLE can potentially be used as an adjunctive agent to lessen the negative photobiologic effects of UVB.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.01.044

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Polypodium leucotomos extract (PLE), derived from a tropical fern in Central and South America, has antioxidative, chemoprotective, immunomodulatory, and anti-inflammatory effects.

    “Polypodium leucotomos extract (PLE) is derived from a tropical fern found in Central and South America and has antioxidative, chemoprotective, immunomodulatory, and anti-inflammatory effects [84, 85].”

    From Sunscreens and Photoaging: A Review of Current Literature (2021) · cites this paper as [84]

  • In 22 individuals irradiated with UVB, UVA, and VL, oral PLE suppressed UVB-induced erythema within 2 h of administration.

    “In a recent study of 22 individuals irradiated with UVB, UVA, and VL, oral PLE demonstrated suppressive effects on UVB-induced erythema within 2 h of administration [84].”

    From Sunscreens and Photoaging: A Review of Current Literature (2021) · cites this paper as [84]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 84

Authors
Kohli, I., Shafi, R., Isedeh, P., Griffith, J. L., Al-Jamal, M. S., Silpa-archa, N., Jackson, B., Athar, M., Kollias, N., Elmets, C. A., Lim, H. W., & Hamzavi, I. H.
Affiliations
  • Henry Ford Health (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Hamzavi, Iltefat H.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
77
Issue
1
Pages
33-41.e1
ISSN
0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2597910756
Cited by
84
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2
FWCI
9.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01BX003395)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA193885)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES026219)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Keywords
UV-B radiation, photoprotection, UVB-induced skin damage, Fitzpatrick skin type, histopathology, colorimetry, oral administration
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Female, Humans, Male, Plant Extracts, Skin, Ultraviolet Rays, Polypodium

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review