Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 528

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Merkel cell carcinoma: Current US incidence and projected increases based on changing demographics

Open access
Paulson, Kelly G., Park, Song Youn, Vandeven, Natalie A., Lachance, Kristina, Thomas, Hannah, Chapuis, Aude G., Harms, Kelly L., Thompson, John A., Bhatia, Shailender, Stang, Andreas, Nghiem, Paul·2018·Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Abstract

Background Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) incidence rates are rising and strongly age‐associated, relevant for an aging population. Objective Determine MCC incidence in the United States and project incident cases through the year 2025. Methods Registry data were obtained from the SEER‐18 Database, containing 6600 MCC cases. Age‐ and sex‐adjusted projections were generated using US census data. Results During 2000‐2013, the number of reported solid cancer cases increased 15%, melanoma cases increased 57%, and MCC cases increased 95%. In 2013, the MCC incidence rate was 0.7 cases/100,000 person‐years in the United States, corresponding to 2488 cases/year. MCC incidence increased exponentially with age, from 0.1 to 1.0 to 9.8 (per 100,000 person‐years) among age groups 40‐44 years, 60‐64 years, and ≥85 years, respectively. Due to aging of the Baby Boomer generation, US MCC incident cases are predicted to climb to 2835 cases/year in 2020 and 3284 cases/year in 2025. Limitations We assumed that the age‐adjusted incidence rate would stabilize, and thus, the number of incident cases we projected might be an underestimate. Conclusion An aging population is driving brisk increases in the number of new MCC cases in the United States. This growing impact combined with the rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape warrants expanded awareness of MCC diagnosis and management.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.10.028

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

See all 528

Metadata

Authors
Paulson, K. G., Park, S. Y., Vandeven, N. A., Lachance, K., Thomas, H., Chapuis, A. G., Harms, K. L., Thompson, J. A., Bhatia, S., Stang, A., & Nghiem, P.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
78
Issue
3
Pages
457-463.e2
ISSN
0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2766831098
Cited by
528
References
34
FWCI
15.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Merkel cell carcinoma: Current US incidence and projected increases based on changing demographics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jaad.2017.10.028
The paper
Paulson, K. G., Park, S. Y., Vandeven, N. A., Lachance, K., Thomas, H., Chapuis, A. G., Harms, K. L., Thompson, J. A., Bhatia, S., Stang, A., & Nghiem, P. (2018). Merkel cell carcinoma: Current US incidence and projected increases based on changing demographics. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2017.10.028

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.