Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 542

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pressure ulcers: Pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors, and presentation

Mervis, Joshua S., Phillips, Tania J.·2019·Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Abstract

Though preventable in the vast majority of cases, pressure ulcers continue to pose a major burden to the individual and society, affecting up to 3 million adults annually in the United States alone. Despite increased national attention over the past 20 years, the prevalence of pressure ulcers has largely remained unchanged, while associated costs of care continue to increase. Dermatologists can play a significant role in pressure ulcer prevention by becoming aware of at-risk populations and implementing suitable preventive strategies. Moreover, dermatologists should be able to recognize early changes that occur prior to skin breakdown and to properly identify and stage pressure ulcers so as to prevent delay of appropriate care. The aim of the first part of this continuing medical education article is to discuss the pathophysiology, risk factors, epidemiology, social and economic burden, and clinical presentation of pressure ulcers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.12.069

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 542

Metadata

Authors
Mervis, J. S., & Phillips, T. J.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
81
Issue
4
Pages
881-890
ISSN
0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2910554271
Cited by
542
References
2
FWCI
63.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.