Cited by 87Acne and Rosacea Treatments and EffectsDermatology and Skin DiseasesLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health

The clinical utility of laboratory monitoring during isotretinoin therapy for acne and changes to monitoring practices over time

Open access
Barbieri, John S., Shin, Daniel B., Wang, Shiyu, Margolis, David J., Takeshita, Junko·2020·Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Abstract

Background As a result of concerns about hypertriglyceridemia, liver enzyme abnormalities, and leukopenia during isotretinoin therapy for acne, patients are often monitored closely with routine laboratory assessments, although the value of this practice has been questioned.Methods We conducted a cohort study of patients receiving isotretinoin for acne between January 1, 2008, and June 30, 2017, using the OptumInsights Electronic Health Record Database (Optum, Eden Prairie, MN) to evaluate the frequency of laboratory abnormalities. Poisson regression was used to evaluate for changes to the frequency of routine laboratory monitoring over time.Results Among 1863 patients treated with isotretinoin, grade 3 or greater triglyceride and liver function testing abnormalities were noted in fewer than 1% and 0.5% of patients screened, respectively. No grade 3 or greater cholesterol or complete blood count abnormalities were observed. There were no meaningful changes in the frequency of laboratory monitoring over time.Limitations Limitations include that we are unable to evaluate the clinical notes to understand the exact clinical decision making when clinicians encountered abnormal laboratory values.Conclusion Although laboratory abnormalities are rare and often do not influence management, frequent laboratory monitoring remains a common practice. There are opportunities to improve the quality of care among patients being treated with isotretinoin for acne by reducing the frequency of lipid and liver function monitoring and by eliminating complete blood count monitoring.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.06.025

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • No grade 3 or greater abnormalities in the complete blood count were observed.

    “No grade 3 or greater abnormalities in the complete blood count was observed.”

    From Guidelines of care for the management of acne vulgaris (2024) · cites this paper as [270]

  • In two isotretinoin cohort studies, the risk of mild normocytic anemia was 0.4%, abnormal platelet level 1.2% to 2.9%, and abnormal white blood cell count 7.0% to 10.8%.

    “Data from 2 isotretinoin cohort studies estimated the risk of mild normocytic anemia as 0.4%, abnormal platelet level at 1.2% to 2.9%, and abnormal white blood cell count at 7.0% to 10.8%”

    From Guidelines of care for the management of acne vulgaris (2024) · cites this paper as [270]

    The Results (Frequency of laboratory abnormalities; page unavailable) report no significant white blood cell or platelet abnormalities in this cohort, but do not give the claimed rates for mild normocytic anemia, abnormal platelets, or abnormal white blood cell counts. Searches for the percentages and anemia terms found no passage reporting those estimates or combining two cohorts. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 87

Authors
Barbieri, J. S., Shin, D. B., Wang, S., Margolis, D. J., & Takeshita, J.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Barbieri, John S.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
82
Issue
1
Pages
72-79
ISSN
0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2953351697
Cited by
87
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1
FWCI
9.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
  • Pfizer Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Keywords
isotretinoin, acne, laboratory monitoring, hypertriglyceridemia, liver function tests, complete blood count, lipid monitoring, quality of care
MeSH terms
Acne Vulgaris, Administration, Oral, Adolescent, Dermatologic Agents, Facial Dermatoses, Female, Humans, Hyperlipidemias, Liver Function Tests, Male, Monitoring, Physiologic, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Triglycerides, Cohort Studies, Isotretinoin, Poisson Distribution, Databases, Factual, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review