Cited by 76Dermatology and Skin DiseasesContact Dermatitis and AllergiesDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions

The impact of dupilumab on patch testing and the prevalence of comorbid allergic contact dermatitis in recalcitrant atopic dermatitis: A retrospective chart review

Raffi, Jodie, Suresh, Raagini, Botto, Nina, Murase, Jenny E.·2020·Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Abstract

Background It is unclear whether the type 2 T helper cell-specific immunosuppressive action of dupilumab interferes with patch testing. Objectives We sought to evaluate the reliability of patch testing on dupilumab and the contribution of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) to complex dermatitis in patients with residual dermatitis on dupilumab. Methods This is a retrospective chart review of 48 patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) who were treated with dupilumab. We compare the results of patch tests performed before and after the initiation of dupilumab and the prevalence of comorbid ACD in patch-tested individuals. Results A minority of patch test reactions were "lost" on dupilumab (13/125; 10.4%). Five of 13 lost reactions occurred in individuals with documented immunodeficiency. Thirty-two of 35 patch-tested patients (91.4%) had comorbid ACD; 92.3% of individuals patch tested on dupilumab experienced further clinical improvement with allergen avoidance. Limitations This is a nonrandomized study in a small cohort of patients. The clearance of dupilumab was assessed by subjective patient reports. Conclusions Dupilumab does not appear to exert a dampening effect on patch test results. AD with comorbid ACD was highly prevalent and allergen avoidance resulted in significant improvement in residual dermatitis that had not resolved without dupilumab therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.028

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Raffi et al found that out of 125 before therapy/on therapy patch test pairs, only 13 were lost after administration of dupilumab.

    “Moreover, a retrospective review by Raffi et al 26 found that out of 125 before therapy/on therapy patch test pairs, only 13 were lost after administration of dupilumab.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Raffi, J., Suresh, R., Botto, N., & Murase, J. E.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Palo Alto Medical Foundation (US)
Corresponding author
Murase, Jenny E.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
82
Issue
1
Pages
132-138
ISSN
0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2976891766
Cited by
76
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 1
FWCI
11.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Keywords
dupilumab, patch testing, allergic contact dermatitis, atopic dermatitis, Th2 cells, immunosuppression, allergen avoidance, comorbidities, immunodeficiency
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dermatitis, Atopic, Female, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Patch Tests, Retrospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Treatment Outcome, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact, Young Adult, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review