Cited by 160Dermatology and Skin DiseasesContact Dermatitis and AllergiesDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions

Facial and neck erythema associated with dupilumab treatment: A systematic review

Jo, Christine E., Finstad, Alexandra, Georgakopoulos, Jorge R., Piguet, Vincent, Yeung, Jensen, Drucker, Aaron M.·2021·Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Abstract

Background Neither dupilumab-associated facial erythema nor neck erythema was reported in phase 3 clinical trials for the treatment of atopic dermatitis, but there have been a number of reports of patients developing this adverse event in clinical practice. Objective To outline all cases of reported dupilumab-associated facial or neck erythema to better characterize this adverse event, and identify potential etiologies and management strategies. Methods A search was conducted on EMBASE and PubMed databases. Two independent reviewers identified relevant studies for inclusion and performed data extraction. Results A total of 101 patients from 16 studies were reported to have dupilumab-associated facial or neck erythema. A total of 52 of 101 patients (52%) had baseline atopic dermatitis facial or neck involvement and 45 of 101 (45%) reported different cutaneous symptoms from preexisting atopic dermatitis, possibly suggesting a different etiology. Suggested etiologies included rosacea, allergic contact dermatitis, and head and neck dermatitis. Most commonly used treatments included topical corticosteroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors, and antifungal agents. In the 57 patients with data on the course of the adverse events, improvement was observed in 29, clearance in 4, no response in 16, and worsening in 8. A total of 11 of 101 patients (11%) discontinued dupilumab owing to this adverse event. Limitations Limited diagnostic testing, nonstandardized data collection and reportin…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.01.012

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jo, C. E., Finstad, A., Georgakopoulos, J. R., Piguet, V., Yeung, J., & Drucker, A. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Drucker, Aaron M.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
84
Issue
5
Pages
1339-1347
ISSN
0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3118463777
Cited by
160
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 11
FWCI
4.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Sanofi
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Keywords
dupilumab, facial erythema, adverse drug reactions, atopic dermatitis, rosacea, allergic contact dermatitis, head and neck dermatitis, topical corticosteroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors, antifungal agents, drug discontinuation
MeSH terms
Administration, Cutaneous, Antifungal Agents, Dermatitis, Atopic, Diagnosis, Differential, Erythema, Facial Dermatoses, Humans, Neck, Rosacea, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Calcineurin Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review