Pediatric teledermatology: A retrospective review of 1199 encounters during the COVID-19 pandemic
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most respondents (76%) used parent-submitted photographs to supplement video visits, and a majority (73.4%) of clinicians who lacked photographs believed that photographs would have helped with the diagnosis.
“Most respondents (76%) used parent-submitted photographs to supplement video visits, and a majority (73.4%) of clinicians who lacked photographs believe that photographs would have helped with the diagnosis [48].”
From Store-and-Forward Images in Teledermatology: Narrative Literature Review (2022) · cites this paper as [48]
The study description says its video-visit surveys asked providers about supplementary photographs, and Table II analyzes whether photographs were submitted. The passages in our copy do not report that 76% used parent-submitted photographs or that 73.4% of clinicians without photographs thought they would have helped diagnosis. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn Havele et al, management of alopecia was associated with issues with video and photograph quality.
“In this study, the management of alopecia was associated with issues with video and photograph quality.”
From A Glance at the Practice of Pediatric Teledermatology Pre- and Post–COVID-19: Narrative Review (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 5 · Cited by 11
- Authors
- Havele, S. A., Fathy, R., McMahon, P., & Murthy, A. S.
- Affiliations
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Havele, Sonia A.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-09
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 678-680
- ISSN
- 0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8613007
- OpenAlex
- W3215346848
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 1.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
- University of Pennsylvania
- University of Connecticut
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatological and COVID-19 studies
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Research and COVID-19
- Keywords
- telemedicine, COVID-19 pandemic, video consultation, dermatological care, health care access, waiting time
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, Child, Dermatology, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Telemedicine, Pandemics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
