Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 410

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

TG–FTIR and Py–GC/MS analysis on pyrolysis and combustion of pine sawdust

Open access
Gao, Ningbo, Li, Aimin, Quan, Cui, Du, Lin, Duan, Yue·2013·Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis

Abstract

Pyrolysis and combustion of pine sawdust have been investigated by using thermogravimetric analyzer coupled with Fourier transform infrared spectrometry (TG-FTIR) analysis in this paper. Pyrolysis-gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS) analysis was employed to characterize subsequently the structure and composition of evolving gas in pine sawdust pyrolysis process. TG results showed that both pyrolysis and combustion of pine sawdust presented three weight loss stages, respectively. The apparent activation energy of pyrolysis reaction is 108.18 kJ mol(-1) in temperature of 239-394 degrees C, while under combustion process which is 128.43 kJ mol(-1) and 98.338 kJ mol(-1) in 226-329 degrees C and 349-486 degrees C, respectively. The evolving gaseous products during the pyrolysis and combustion infrared spectrums such as H2O, CH4, CO, CO2, phenol and alkane were found. Py-GC/MS results indicated that the main compounds of pine sawdust thermal decomposition were small molar gases, acetaldehyde, acetic acid, anhydride with formic and acetic anhydride. And possible formation pathways for main pyrolysis products were tentatively presented. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaap.2012.11.009

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Chang, 2011, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36, 14252, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.105 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bridgwater, 2003, Chemical Engineering Journal, 91, 87, 10.1016/S1385-8947(02)00142-0 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Zheng, 2000, Fuel, 79, 181, 10.1016/S0016-2361(99)00130-1 · DOI
  4. Conesa, 2011, Thermochimica Acta, 523, 176, 10.1016/j.tca.2011.05.021 · DOI
  5. Ahamad, 2012, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 199–200, 200, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.10.090 · DOI
  6. Tao, 2010, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 175, 754, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.073 · DOI
  7. Lee, 2009, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 86, 39, 10.1016/j.jaap.2009.04.002 · DOI
  8. Bassilakis, 2001, Fuel, 80, 1765, 10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00061-8 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Singh, 2012, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
  10. Alves, 2006, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 76, 209, 10.1016/j.jaap.2005.11.004 · DOI
  11. Choi, 2001, Holzforschung, 55, 185, 10.1515/HF.2001.031 · DOI
  12. Fahmi, 2007, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 80, 16, 10.1016/j.jaap.2006.12.018 · DOI
  13. Lu, 2009, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 84, 131, 10.1016/j.jaap.2009.01.002 · DOI
  14. Huang, 2011, Bioresource Technology, 102, 3527, 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.049 · DOI
  15. Chen, 2001, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 84, 43, 10.1016/S0304-3894(01)00180-7 · DOI
  16. Gao, 2009, Waste Management & Research, 27, 242, 10.1177/0734242X08091553 · DOI
  17. Ulloa, 2009, Fuel Processing Technology, 90, 583, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2008.12.015 · DOI
  18. Thanasit, 2010, Bioresource Technology, 101, 5638, 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.037 · DOI
  19. Hu, 2007, Fuel, 86, 2778, 10.1016/j.fuel.2007.02.031 · DOI
  20. Aghamohammadi, 2011, Biomass and Bioenergy, 35, 3884, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.06.022 · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.06.022
  21. Gil, 2010, Bioresource Technology, 101, 5601, 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.008 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Saade, 1998, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 45, 9, 10.1016/S0165-2370(98)00058-8 · doi:10.1016/s0165-2370(98)00058-8
  23. Yu, 2008, Biomass and Bioenergy, 32, 1046, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.02.001 · DOI
  24. Shen, 2010, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 87, 199, 10.1016/j.jaap.2009.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Liu, 2008, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 82, 170, 10.1016/j.jaap.2008.03.007 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Ferdous, 2001, Fuel Processing Technology, 70, 9, 10.1016/S0378-3820(00)00147-8 · DOI
  27. Chen, 2009, Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering science, 40, 1154
  28. Güllü, 2001, Energy Conversion and Management, 42, 1349, 10.1016/S0196-8904(00)00126-6 · DOI
  29. Haykiri-Acma, 2010, Fuel Processing Technology, 91, 759, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.02.009 · DOI
  30. Gani, 2007, Renewable Energy, 32, 649, 10.1016/j.renene.2006.02.017 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Piskorz, 1986, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 9, 121, 10.1016/0165-2370(86)85003-3 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Richards, 1987, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 10, 251, 10.1016/0165-2370(87)80006-2 · DOI · Paper page
  33. H. Tan, Mechanism Study of Biomass Pyrolysis, Doctoral dissertation Zhejiang University 2000, in Chinese.
  34. Ayhan, 2004, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 30, 219, 10.1016/j.pecs.2003.10.004 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Peng, 2010, Transactions of China Pulp and Paper, 25, 1

Cited by

See all 410

Metadata

Authors
Gao, N., Li, A., Quan, C., Du, L., & Duan, Y.
Venue
Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
100
Pages
26-32
ISSN
0165-2370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072969581
Cited by
410
References
0
FWCI
9.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TG–FTIR and Py–GC/MS analysis on pyrolysis and combustion of pine sawdust. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jaap.2012.11.009
The paper
Gao, N., Li, A., Quan, C., Du, L., & Duan, Y. (2013). TG–FTIR and Py–GC/MS analysis on pyrolysis and combustion of pine sawdust. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2012.11.009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.