Lignite sulfur transformation during the supercritical water gasification process
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There were differences existing in the sulfurous gases production during SCWG process.
“Finally, there were differences existing in the sulfurous gases production during SCWG process.”
From Sulfur transformation mechanism during supercritical water gasification of black liquor (2023) · cites this paper as [39]
Chen et al. pointed out that H2S was the only detected gaseous sulfur compound in the SCWG of lignite.
“Chen et al. [39] pointed out that H2S was the only detected gaseous sulfur compound in the SCWG of lignite, and Liu et al. [30] also obtained the same result.”
From Sulfur transformation mechanism during supercritical water gasification of black liquor (2023) · cites this paper as [39]
H2 could destroy the delocalization of thiophene compounds directly and release H2S.
“Also H2 could destroy the delocalization of thiophene compounds directly and release H2S as shown in equation (14)–(15) [39].”
From Sulfur transformation mechanism during supercritical water gasification of black liquor (2023) · cites this paper as [39]
Cites
Decomposition of Sodium Thiosulfate and Sodium Thiocyanate in Supercritical Water
IHARA, K., UEDA, H., SUE, K., NONAKA, T., & ARAI, K. (2006) · Journal of the Japan Institute of Energy · doi:10.3775/jie.85.126 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McGaughy, K., & Toufiq Reza, M. (2018) · Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery · doi:10.1007/s13399-017-0276-4 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Sulfur transformation mechanism during supercritical water gasification of black liquor
Lu, L., Wei, W., Liu, F., Ge, Z., Jin, H., Chen, Y., & Guo, L. (2023) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2022.127333 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chen, G., Chen, S., Song, Z., Zhao, X., & Ma, C.
- Affiliations
- Shandong University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Ma, Chunyuan
- Venue
- Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 116
- Pages
- 161-167
- ISSN
- 0165-2370 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1755880349
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 1.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2014BAC26B03)
- Key Laboratory of Low-grade Energy Utilization Technology and System, Chongqing University (201409, LLEUTS 201409)
- National Key Research and Development Program of China
- Key Technologies Research and Development Program
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (51306106, U1361113)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Mining and Gasification Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Coal Properties and Utilization
- Keywords
- lignite, supercritical water gasification, sulfur transformation, pyrite, iron sulfide, organosulfur compounds, sulfate, hydrogen sulfide, sulfur emissions, reaction mechanism, sulfur speciation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
