Artificial Intelligence Discusses the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Translational Medicine
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ChatGPT, among other LLMs, can have transforming potential in health care practice via enhancing diagnostics, prediction of disease risk and outcome, and drug discovery.
“Additionally, ChatGPT, among other LLMs, can have a transforming potential in health care practice via enhancing diagnostics, prediction of disease risk and outcome, and drug discovery among other areas in translational research [51,52,68].”
From ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns (2023) · cites this paper as [52]
The “Why Is Artificial Intelligence the Future of Translational Medicine?” section says AI can identify disease risk factors, predict patient outcomes, and help develop new drugs. It does not address enhanced diagnostics, and these applications are described for AI algorithms generally rather than specifically for ChatGPT or other LLMs. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredCurrent LLMs including ChatGPT are unable to comprehend the complexity of biologic systems, which is an important concept needed in health care decisions and research.
“Importantly, the current LLMs including ChatGPT are unable to comprehend the complexity of biologic systems, which is an important concept needed in health care decisions and research [52,68].”
From ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns (2023) · cites this paper as [52]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 1 · Cited by 93
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [2]Mann D.L. Will artificial intelligence transform translational medicine: (not so) elementary, my dear Watson J Am Coll Cardiol Basic Trans Science 6 2021 400 401 PMC8093525 33997527
- Authors
- Mann, D. L.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mann, Douglas L.
- ORCID
- Mann, Douglas L.
- Venue
- JACC: Basic to Translational Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-02
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 221-223
- ISSN
- 2452-302X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9998448
- OpenAlex
- W4317376696
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 40 · 2021: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 3.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- JACC Basic to Translational Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 BX005065)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, translational medicine, clinical research applications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
