Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,062

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy

Open access
Bax, Jeroen J., Bleeker, Gabe B., Marwick, Thomas H., Molhoek, Sander G., Boersma, Eric, Steendijk, Paul, van der Wall, Ernst E., Schalij, Martin J.·2004·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES This study was designed to predict the response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves HF symptoms, exercise capacity, and left ventricular (LV) function. Because not all patients respond, preimplantation identification of responders is needed. In the present study, response to CRT was predicted by the presence of LV dyssynchrony assessed by tissue Doppler imaging. Moreover, the prognostic value of LV dyssynchrony in patients undergoing CRT was assessed. METHODS Eighty-five patients with end-stage HF, QRS duration >120 ms, and left bundle-branch block were evaluated by tissue Doppler imaging before CRT. At baseline and six months follow-up, New York Heart Association functional class, quality of life and 6-min walking distance, LV volumes, and LV ejection fraction were determined. Events (death, hospitalization for decompensated HF) were obtained during one-year follow-up. RESULTS Responders (74%) and nonresponders (26%) had comparable baseline characteristics, except for a larger dyssynchrony in responders (87 +/- 49 ms vs. 35 +/- 20 ms, p < 0.01). Receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that an optimal cutoff value of 65 ms for LV dyssynchrony yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 80% to predict clinical improvement and of 92% to predict LV reverse remodeling. Patients with dyssynchrony >/=65 ms had an excellent prognosis (6% event rate) after CRT as compared with a 50% event rate in patients with dyssynchrony <65 ms (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Patients with LV dyssynchrony >/=65 ms respond to CRT and have an excellent prognosis after CRT.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.016

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,062

Metadata

Authors
Bax, J. J., Bleeker, G. B., Marwick, T. H., Molhoek, S. G., Boersma, E., Steendijk, P., van der Wall, E. E., & Schalij, M. J.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-11
Volume
44
Issue
9
Pages
1834-1840
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046712202
Cited by
1,062
References
1
FWCI
44.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.016
The paper
Bax, J. J., Bleeker, G. B., Marwick, T. H., Molhoek, S. G., Boersma, E., Steendijk, P., van der Wall, E. E., & Schalij, M. J. (2004). Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.016

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.