Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 500

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Resynchronization Therapy in Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease Patients

Open access
Dubin, Anne M., Janousek, Jan, Rhee, Edward, Strieper, Margaret J., Cecchin, Frank, Law, Ian H., Shannon, Kevin M., Temple, Joel, Rosenthal, Eric, Zimmerman, Frank J., Davis, Andrew, Karpawich, Peter P., Al Ahmad, Amin, Vetter, Victoria L., Kertesz, Naomi J., Shah, Maully, Snyder, Christopher, Stephenson, Elizabeth, Emmel, Mathias, Sanatani, Shubhayan, Kanter, Ronald, Batra, Anjan, Collins, Kathryn K.·2005·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES Our objective was to evaluate the short-term safety and efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in children. BACKGROUND Cardiac resynchronization therapy has been beneficial for adult patients with poor left ventricular function and intraventricular conduction delay. The efficacy of this therapy in the young and in those with congenital heart disease (CHD) has not yet been established. METHODS This is a multi-center, retrospective evaluation of CRT in 103 patients from 22 institutions. RESULTS Median age at time of implantation was 12.8 years (3 months to 55.4 years). Median duration of follow-up was four months (22 days to 1 year). The diagnosis was CHD in 73 patients (71%), cardiomyopathy in 16 (16%), and congenital complete atrioventricular block in 14 (13%). The QRS duration before pacing was 166.1 +/- 33.3 ms, which decreased after CRT by 37.7 +/- 30.7 ms (p < 0.01). Pre-CRT systemic ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was 26.2 +/- 11.6%. The EF increased by 12.8 +/- 12.7 EF units with a mean EF after CRT of 39.9 +/- 14.8% (p < 0.05). Of 18 patients who underwent CRT while listed for heart transplantation, 3 improved sufficiently to allow removal from the transplant waiting list, 5 underwent transplant, 2 died, and 8 others are currently awaiting transplant. CONCLUSIONS Cardiac resynchronization therapy appears to offer benefit in pediatric and CHD patients who differ substantially from the adult populations in whom this therapy has been most thoroughly evaluated to date. Further studies looking at the long-term benefit of this therapy in this population are needed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.096

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 500

Metadata

Authors
Dubin, A. M., Janousek, J., Rhee, E., Strieper, M. J., Cecchin, F., Law, I. H., Shannon, K. M., Temple, J., Rosenthal, E., Zimmerman, F. J., Davis, A., Karpawich, P. P., Al Ahmad, A., Vetter, V. L., Kertesz, N. J., Shah, M., Snyder, C., Stephenson, E., Emmel, M., Sanatani, S., Kanter, R., Batra, A., & Collins, K. K.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-12
Volume
46
Issue
12
Pages
2277-2283
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W139591247
Cited by
500
References
1
FWCI
15.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resynchronization Therapy in Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.096
The paper
Dubin, A. M., Janousek, J., Rhee, E., Strieper, M. J., Cecchin, F., Law, I. H., Shannon, K. M., Temple, J., Rosenthal, E., Zimmerman, F. J., Davis, A., Karpawich, P. P., Al Ahmad, A., Vetter, V. L., Kertesz, N. J., Shah, M., Snyder, C., Stephenson, E., Emmel, M., . . . Collins, K. K. (2005). Resynchronization Therapy in Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease Patients. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.096

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.