Norepinephrine transporter inhibition prevents tilt-induced pre-syncope
Open accessAbstract
Objectives We tested the hypothesis that pharmacological norepinephrine reuptake transporter (NET) inhibition delays the onset of head-up tilt-induced presyncope in healthy subjects.Background Treatment of neurally mediated syncope is unsatisfactory. In a previous study in a small number of healthy subjects, pharmacologic NET inhibition delayed the onset of head-up tilt-induced pre-syncope.Methods We combined data sets from 3 substudies comprising 51 healthy subjects without a history of syncope. In a double-blind, randomized, cross-over fashion, subjects underwent 2 head-up tilt tests, once with placebo and once with a NET inhibitor (sibutramine or reboxetine). Tilt testing was prematurely ended when pre-syncopal symptoms such as dizziness, nausea, or visual disturbances occurred together with a decrease in blood pressure and/or heart rate.Results The mean tolerated tilt test duration was 29 +/- 2 min with placebo and 35 +/- 1 min with NET inhibition (p = 0.001). The odds ratio for premature abortion of head-up tilt testing was 0.22 (95% confidence interval 0.09 to 0.55, p < 0.001) in favor of NET inhibition. Norepinephrine reuptake transporter inhibition elicited a pressor response and increased upright heart rate.Conclusions In healthy subjects, NET inhibition prevents tilt-induced neurally mediated (pre)syncope. Therefore, NET inhibition may be a worthwhile target of drug intervention for larger trials in highly symptomatic patients with neurally mediated syncope.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In double-blind, randomized, crossover fashion, reboxetine and sibutramine block or attenuate the vasovagal reflex during tilt testing.
“In double-blind, randomized, crossover fashion, reboxetine and sibutramine block or attenuate the vasovagal reflex during tilt testing. 288”
From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [288]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- Schroeder, C., Birkenfeld, A. L., Mayer, A. F., Tank, J., Diedrich, A., Luft, F. C., & Jordan, J.
- Affiliations
- Helios Kliniken (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Jordan, Jens
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 516-522
- ISSN
- 0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2063740829
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (submittedVersion)
- Site cant be reached (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Keywords
- norepinephrine reuptake inhibition, neurally mediated syncope, presyncope, head-up tilt, sibutramine, reboxetine, pressor response, syncope prevention
- MeSH terms
- Reboxetine, Blood Pressure, Cyclobutanes, Double-Blind Method, Heart Rate, Humans, Morpholines, Posture, Syncope, Head-Down Tilt, Cross-Over Studies, Norepinephrine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review