Cited by 190Diet and metabolism studiesDietary Effects on HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Metabolic Effects of Weight Loss on a Very-Low-Carbohydrate Diet Compared With an Isocaloric High-Carbohydrate Diet in Abdominally Obese Subjects

Open access
Tay, Jeannie, Brinkworth, Grant D., Noakes, Manny, Keogh, Jennifer, Clifton, Peter M.·2008·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives This study was designed to compare the effects of an energy-reduced, isocaloric very-low-carbohydrate, high-fat (VLCHF) diet and a high-carbohydrate, low-fat (HCLF) diet on weight loss and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk outcomes.Background Despite the popularity of the VLCHF diet, no studies have compared the chronic effects of weight loss and metabolic change to a conventional HCLF diet under isocaloric conditions.Methods A total of 88 abdominally obese adults were randomly assigned to either an energy-restricted (approximately 6 to 7 MJ, 30% deficit), planned isocaloric VLCHF or HCLF diet for 24 weeks in an outpatient clinical trial. Body weight, blood pressure, fasting glucose, lipids, insulin, apolipoprotein B (apoB), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured at weeks 0 and 24.Results Weight loss was similar in both groups (VLCHF -11.9 +/- 6.3 kg, HCLF -10.1 +/- 5.7 kg; p = 0.17). Blood pressure, CRP, fasting glucose, and insulin reduced similarly with weight loss in both diets. The VLCHF diet produced greater decreases in triacylglycerols (VLCHF -0.64 +/- 0.62 mmol/l, HCLF -0.35 +/- 0.49 mmol/l; p = 0.01) and increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (VLCHF 0.25 +/- 0.28 mmol/l, HCLF 0.08 +/- 0.17 mmol/l; p = 0.002). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) decreased in the HCLF diet but remained unchanged in the VLCHF diet (VLCHF 0.06 +/- 0.58 mmol/l, HCLF -0.46 +/- 0.71 mmol/l; p < 0.001). However, a high degree of individual variability for the LDL response in the VLCHF diet was observed, with 24% of individuals reporting an increase of at least 10%. The apoB levels remained unchanged in both diet groups.Conclusions Under isocaloric conditions, VLCHF and HCLF diets result in similar weight loss. Overall, although both diets had similar improvements for a number of metabolic risk markers, an HCLF diet had more favorable effects on the blood lipid profile. This suggests that the potential long-term effects of the VLCHF diet for CVD risk remain a concern and that blood lipid levels should be monitored. (Long-term health effects of high and low carbohydrate, weight loss diets in obese subjects with the metabolic syndrome; http://www.anzctr.org.au; ACTR No. 12606000203550).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.08.050

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 190

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Yancy WS, Guyton JR, Baakst RP, Westman EC. A randomized, controlled trial of a low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet vs. a low-fat diet for obesity and hyperlipidemia. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;72:343S.

Authors
Tay, J., Brinkworth, G. D., Noakes, M., Keogh, J., & Clifton, P. M.
Affiliations
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Corresponding author
Brinkworth, Grant D.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
59-67
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023234281
Cited by
190
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
10.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
  • National Heart Foundation of Australia
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
very low carbohydrate diet, high-carbohydrate diet, weight loss, abdominal obesity, caloric restriction, isocaloric diet, cardiovascular risk, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, apolipoprotein B, C-reactive protein, insulin, fasting blood glucose, blood pressure, high-fat diet, low-fat diet
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diet Fads, Female, Humans, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Risk Factors, Triglycerides, Weight Loss, Treatment Outcome, Abdominal Fat, Lipid Metabolism, Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review