Intensive Lipid Lowering With Atorvastatin in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease
Open accessAbstract
Objectives This subanalysis of the TNT (Treating to New Targets) study investigates the effects of intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) with and without pre-existing chronic kidney disease (CKD).Background Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with CKD.Methods A total of 10,001 patients with CHD were randomized to double-blind therapy with atorvastatin 80 mg/day or 10 mg/day. Patients with CKD were identified at baseline on the basis of an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. The primary efficacy outcome was time to first major cardiovascular event.Results Of 9,656 patients with complete renal data, 3,107 had CKD at baseline and demonstrated greater cardiovascular comorbidity than those with normal eGFR (n = 6,549). After a median follow-up of 5.0 years, 351 patients with CKD (11.3%) experienced a major cardiovascular event, compared with 561 patients with normal eGFR (8.6%) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18 to 1.54; p < 0.0001). Compared with atorvastatin 10 mg, atorvastatin 80 mg reduced the relative risk of major cardiovascular events by 32% in patients with CKD (HR = 0.68; 95% CI 0.55 to 0.84; p = 0.0003) and 15% in patients with normal eGFR (HR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.72 to 1.00; p = 0.049). Both doses of atorvastatin were well tolerated in patients with CKD.Conclusions Aggressive lipid lowering with atorvastatin 80 mg was both safe and effective in reducing the excess of cardiovascular events in a high-risk population with CKD and CHD.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In those post hoc analyses, suppressive effects of statins on cerebrovascular diseases were not demonstrated.
“However, suppressive effects on cerebrovascular diseases were not demonstrated.”
From Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) guidelines for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases 2017 (2018) · cites this paper as [772]
In patients with CKD complicated with CAD, post hoc analyses of early-stage secondary prevention studies using statins have reported that statin use suppresses cardiovascular events in patients with mild CKD and an eGFR < 75 mL/min/1.73 m2.
“These analyses have reported that statin use suppresses cardiovascular events in patients with mild CKD and an eGFR < 75 mL/min/1.73 m2 771, 772).”
From Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) guidelines for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases 2017 (2018) · cites this paper as [772]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 302
- Authors
- Shepherd, J., Kastelein, J. J. P., Bittner, V., Deedwania, P., Breazna, A., Dobson, S., Wilson, D. J., Zuckerman, A., & Wenger, N. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Pfizer (United States) (US)
- Emory University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shepherd, James
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1448-1454
- ISSN
- 0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1483531931
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 34.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Pfizer
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Keywords
- atorvastatin, intensive lipid lowering, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, major adverse cardiovascular events, statin dose comparison, estimated glomerular filtration rate, TNT trial
- MeSH terms
- Atorvastatin, Adult, Aged, Anticholesteremic Agents, Coronary Artery Disease, Double-Blind Method, Female, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Heptanoic Acids, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Lipids, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Pyrroles, Risk, Triglycerides, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review