Genomics
Open accessAbstract
With the current shift toward an older population, calcific aortic valve stenosis (AVS) is likely to become a major societal and economic burden. For many years, AVS was regarded as a degenerative and nonmodifiable process. However, molecular studies unanimously demonstrated that AVS is an actively regulated disorder with several potential therapeutic targets. Many factors are predicted to cause AVS, and an important genetic predisposition is anticipated. In this review, we describe candidate genes and signaling pathways identified by genetic research and incorporate this new knowledge into a more comprehensive picture of factors involved in the pathogenesis of AVS. We also emphasize the need for additional studies to elucidate its complete genetic architecture. Recent advances in genomic research offer a remarkable opportunity to investigate AVS at the most fundamental level. The benefits of these new approaches can be observed in many complex diseases, but the field of AVS is trailing behind. We discuss the future utility of these new genomic approaches to improve our understanding of AVS and to refine the management of patients in terms of diagnosis, prevention, and treatment.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several studies suggest a genetic component is involved in promoting calcific AS associated with bicuspid or tricuspid aortic valves.
“Several studies suggest that a genetic component is involved in promoting calcific AS associated with bicuspid or tricuspid aortic valves6;17;48;145.”
From Calcific aortic stenosis (2016) · cites this paper as [6]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 90 · Cited by 82
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [49]49. Clementi M, Notari L, Borghi A, Tenconi R. Familial congenital bicuspid aortic valve: a disorder of uncertain inheritance. Am J Med Genet 1996;62:336 -8.
- Authors
- Bossé, Y., Mathieu, P., & Pibarot, P.
- Affiliations
- Université Laval (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Bossé, Yohan
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1327-1336
- ISSN
- 0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W66882102
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 90
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Corpus Université Laval (Université Laval) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
- Keywords
- calcific aortic stenosis, genetic susceptibility, candidate genes, signaling pathways, pathogenesis, genetic architecture, population aging, therapeutic target
- MeSH terms
- Aortic Valve Stenosis, Calcinosis, Humans, Interleukins, Risk Factors, Transforming Growth Factors, Signal Transduction, Disease Progression, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review