Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 443

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Contemporary Outcomes After the Fontan Procedure

Open access
Anderson, Page A.W., Sleeper, Lynn A., Mahony, Lynn, Colan, Steven D., Atz, Andrew M., Breitbart, Roger E., Gersony, Welton M., Gallagher, Dianne, Geva, Tal, Margossian, Renee, McCrindle, Brian W., Paridon, Stephen, Schwartz, Marcy, Stylianou, Mario, Williams, Richard V., Clark, Bernard J.·2008·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Background The characteristics of contemporary Fontan survivors are not well described. Objective We characterized a large cohort of children who had a Fontan procedure, using measures of functional health status, ventricular size and function, exercise capacity, heart rhythm, and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP). Methods We enrolled 546 children (6–18 years, mean 11.9 years) and compared them within pre-specified anatomic and procedure subgroups. History and outcome measures were obtained within a three month period. Results Predominant ventricular morphology was left (LV) 49%, right (RV) 34%, and mixed 19%. Ejection fraction (EF) was normal for 73% of subjects; diastolic function grade was normal for 28%. Child Health Questionnaire mean summary scores were lower than for controls; however, over 80% of subjects were in the normal range. BNP concentration ranged from <4–652 pg/mL (median 13). Mean percent predicted peak oxygen consumption was 65% and decreased with age. EF and EF z-score were lowest, and semilunar and atrioventricular (AV) valve regurgitation were more prevalent in the RV subgroup. Older age at Fontan was associated with more severe AV valve regurgitation. Most outcomes were not associated with a superior cavopulmonary connection prior to Fontan. Conclusions Measures of ventricular systolic function and functional health status, although lower on average in the cohort compared to controls, were in the majority of subjects within two standard deviations of the mean for controls. RV morphology was associated with poorer ventricular and valvar function. Effective strategies to preserve ventricular and valvar function, particularly for patients with RV morphology, are needed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.01.074

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

See all 443

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, P. A. W., Sleeper, L. A., Mahony, L., Colan, S. D., Atz, A. M., Breitbart, R. E., Gersony, W. M., Gallagher, D., Geva, T., Margossian, R., McCrindle, B. W., Paridon, S., Schwartz, M., Stylianou, M., Williams, R. V., & Clark, B. J.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
85-98
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1524688258
Cited by
443
References
16
FWCI
20.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contemporary Outcomes After the Fontan Procedure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.01.074
The paper
Anderson, P. A. W., Sleeper, L. A., Mahony, L., Colan, S. D., Atz, A. M., Breitbart, R. E., Gersony, W. M., Gallagher, D., Geva, T., Margossian, R., McCrindle, B. W., Paridon, S., Schwartz, M., Stylianou, M., Williams, R. V., & Clark, B. J. (2008). Contemporary Outcomes After the Fontan Procedure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.01.074

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.