Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 236

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of Copeptin, B-Type Natriuretic Peptide, and Amino-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

Open access
Neuhold, Stephanie, Huelsmann, Martin, Strunk, Guido, Stoiser, Brigitte, Struck, Joachim, Morgenthaler, Nils G., Bergmann, Andreas, Moertl, Deddo, Berger, Rudolf, Pacher, Richard·2008·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate the predictive value of copeptin over the entire spectrum of heart failure (HF) and compare it to the current benchmark markers, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). BACKGROUND Vasopressin has been shown to increase with the severity of chronic HF. Copeptin is a fragment of pre-pro-vasopressin that is synthesized and secreted in equimolar amounts to vasopressin. Both hormones have a short lifetime in vivo, similar to BNPs, but in contrast to vasopressin, copeptin is very stable in vitro. The predictive value of copeptin has been shown in advanced HF, where it was superior to BNP for predicting 24-month mortality. METHODS This was a long-term observational study in 786 HF patients from the whole spectrum of heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class I to IV, BNP 688 +/- 948 pg/ml [range 3 to 8,536 pg/ml], left ventricular ejection fraction 25 +/- 10% [range 5% to 65%]). RESULTS The NYHA functional class was the most potent single predictor of 24-month outcome in a stepwise Cox regression model. The BNP, copeptin, and glomerular filtration rate were related to NYHA functional class (p < 0.0001 for trend). Copeptin was the most potent single predictor of mortality in patients with NYHA functional class II (p < 0.0001) and class III (p < 0.0001). In NYHA functional class IV, the outcome of patients was best predicted by serum sodium, but again, copeptin added additional independent information. CONCLUSIONS Increased levels of copeptin are linked to excess mortality, and this link is maintained irrespective of the clinical signs of severity of the disease. Copeptin was superior to BNP or NT-proBNP in this study, but the markers seem to be closely related.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.03.050

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 236

Metadata

Authors
Neuhold, S., Huelsmann, M., Strunk, G., Stoiser, B., Struck, J., Morgenthaler, N. G., Bergmann, A., Moertl, D., Berger, R., & Pacher, R.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
52
Issue
4
Pages
266-272
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1598669383
Cited by
236
References
1
FWCI
9.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Copeptin, B-Type Natriuretic Peptide, and Amino-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.03.050
The paper
Neuhold, S., Huelsmann, M., Strunk, G., Stoiser, B., Struck, J., Morgenthaler, N. G., Bergmann, A., Moertl, D., Berger, R., & Pacher, R. (2008). Comparison of Copeptin, B-Type Natriuretic Peptide, and Amino-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.03.050

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.