The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The RYR2-Encoded Ryanodine Receptor/Calcium Release Channel in Patients Diagnosed Previously With Either Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia or Genotype Negative, Exercise-Induced Long QT Syndrome
Open accessAbstract
Objective To determine the spectrum and prevalence of mutations in the RYR2-encoded the cardiac ryanodine receptor in cases with exertional syncope and normal QTc. Background Mutations in the RYR2 cause type 1 catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT1), a cardiac channelopathy with increased propensity for lethal ventricular dysrhythmias. Most RYR2 mutational analyses target 3 canonical domains encoded by < 40% of the translated exons. The extent of CPVT1-associated mutations localizing outside of these domains remains unknown as RYR2 has not been examined comprehensively in most patient cohorts. Methods Mutational analysis of all RYR2 exons was performed using PCR, DHPLC, and DNA sequencing on 155 unrelated patients (49% females, 96% white, age at diagnosis 20 ± 15 years, mean QTc 428 ± 29 ms), with either clinical diagnosis of CPVT (n = 110) or an initial diagnosis of exercise-induced long QT syndrome (LQTS) but with QTc < 480 ms and a subsequent negative LQTS genetic test (n = 45). Results Sixty-three (34 novel) possible CPVT1-associated mutations, absent in 400 reference alleles, were detected in 73 unrelated patients (47%). Thirteen new mutation-containing exons were identified. Two thirds of the CPVT1-positive patients had mutations that localized to one of 16 exons. Conclusions Possible CPVT1 mutations in RYR2 were identified in nearly half of this cohort. 45 of the 105 translated exons are now known to host possible mutations. Considering that ~65% of CPVT1-positive cases would be discovered by selective analysis of 16 exons, a tiered targeting strategy for CPVT genetic testing should be considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Priori, S. G., Wilde, A. A., Horie, M., Cho, Y., Behr, E. R., Berul, C., Blom, N., Brugada, J., Chiang, C.-E., Huikuri, H., et al. (2013) · Heart Rhythm · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.05.014 · Cited by 1,942
Self-citationAllowing for sex differences increases power in a GWAS of multiplex Autism families
Lu, A. T.-H., & Cantor, R. M. (2012) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2010.127 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Medeiros-Domingo, A., Bhuiyan, Z. A., Tester, D. J., Hofman, N., Bikker, H., van Tintelen, J. P., Mannens, M. M. A. M., Wilde, A. A. M., & Ackerman, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 2065-2074
- ISSN
- 0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2119956887
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.