Cardiovascular and cancer mortality in very elderly post-myocardial infarction patients receiving statin treatment
Open accessAbstract
Objectives The purpose of this study was to determine whether statin treatment is effective and safe in very elderly (80 years and older) acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients.Background Elderly individuals constitute an increasing percentage of patients admitted to hospitals for AMI. Despite that these patients have a higher mortality risk, the application of evidence-based medicine remains much lower than for younger patients.Methods We included all patients 80 years and older who were admitted with the diagnosis of AMI in the Register of Information and Knowledge About Swedish Heart Intensive Care Admissions between 1999 and 2003 (n = 21,410). Of these, complete covariate and follow-up data were available for 14,907 patients (study population A). To limit the bias related comorbidity on statin therapy, we also performed analyses excluding patients who died within 14 days of the acute event (study population B) and all patients who died within 365 days (study population C). A propensity score was used to adjust for initial differences between treatment groups.Results All-cause mortality was significantly lower in patients receiving statin treatment at discharge in study population A (relative risk: 0.55, 95% confidence interval: 0.51 to 0.59), in study population B (relative risk: 0.65; 95% confidence interval: 0.60 to 0.71), and in study population C (relative risk: 0.66; 95% confidence interval: 0.59 to 0.76). Similar observations were made for cardiovascular mortality as well as for AMI mortality. There was no increase in cancer mortality in statin-treated patients.Conclusions Statin treatment is associated with lower cardiovascular mortality in very elderly post-infarction patients without increasing the risk of the development of cancer.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A Swedish MI registry study found that statin treatment is associated with lower CV mortality in very elderly post-MI patients without increasing cancer risk.
“Results from an MI registry study in Sweden demonstrate that statin treatment is associated with lower CV mortality in very elderly post-MI patients without increasing the risk of the development of cancer.167”
From ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias (2011) · cites this paper as [167]
A Swedish MI registry study found statin treatment associated with lower CV mortality in very old post-MI patients without increasing cancer risk.
“Results from an MI registry study in Sweden demonstrate that statin treatment is associated with lower CV mortality in very old post-MI patients without (which is important to stress) increasing the risk of cancer. 337”
From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [337]
A Swedish myocardial infarction registry study found that statin treatment is associated with lower cardiovascular mortality in very old post-myocardial infarction patients without increasing cancer risk.
“Results from an MI registry study in Sweden demonstrate that statin treatment is associated with lower CV mortality in very old post-MI patients without (which is important to stress) increasing the risk of cancer.337”
From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [337]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 62
- Authors
- Gränsbo, K., Melander, O., Wallentin, L., Lindbäck, J., Stenestrand, U., Carlsson, J., & Nilsson, J.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Linköping University Hospital (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Nilsson, Jan
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1362-1369
- ISSN
- 0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092994125
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 10.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
- Keywords
- statin therapy, acute myocardial infarction, very elderly patients, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, cancer mortality, post-infarction patients, propensity score matching, treatment safety
- MeSH terms
- Aged, 80 and over, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Humans, Male, Myocardial Infarction, Neoplasms, Registries, Sweden, Survival Analysis, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review