Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 201

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spectrum and Prevalence of Mutations Involving BrS1- Through BrS12-Susceptibility Genes in a Cohort of Unrelated Patients Referred for Brugada Syndrome Genetic Testing

Open access
Crotti, Lia, Marcou, Cherisse A., Tester, David J., Castelletti, Silvia, Giudicessi, John R., Torchio, Margherita, Medeiros-Domingo, Argelia, Simone, Savastano, Will, Melissa L., Dagradi, Federica, Schwartz, Peter J., Ackerman, Michael J.·2012·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objective To provide the spectrum and prevalence of mutations in the 12 Brugada Syndrome (BrS)-susceptibility genes discovered to date, in a single large BrS cohort. Background BrS is a potentially lethal heritable arrhythmia syndrome diagnosed electrocardiographically by coved-type ST segment elevation in the right precordial leads (V1-V3; type-1 Brugada ECG pattern) and the presence of a personal/family history of cardiac events. Methods Using PCR, DHPLC, and DNA sequencing, comprehensive mutational analysis of BrS1-12-susceptibility genes was performed in 129 unrelated patients with possible/probable BrS [46 with clinically diagnosed BrS (ECG pattern plus personal/family history of a cardiac event) and 83 with type 1 ECG pattern only]. Results Overall, 27 (21%) patients had a putative pathogenic mutation, absent in 1400 Caucasian reference alleles, including 21 patients with an SCN5A mutation, 2 CACNB2B, 1 KCNJ8, 1 KCND3, 1 SCN1Bb, and 1 HCN4. The overall mutation yield was 23% in type 1 ECG pattern only patients versus 17% in clinically diagnosed BrS patients, was significantly greater among young men < 20 years of age with clinically diagnosed BrS, and among patients who had a prolonged PQ interval. Conclusions We identified putative pathogenic mutations in ~20% of our BrS cohort, with BrS2-12 accounting for < 5%. Importantly, the yield was similar between patients with only a type 1 BrS ECG pattern and those with clinically established BrS. The yield approaches 40% for SCN5A-mediated BrS (BrS1) when the PQ interval exceeds 200ms. Calcium channel-mediated BrS is extremely unlikely in the absence of a short QT interval.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.04.037

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 201

Metadata

Authors
Crotti, L., Marcou, C. A., Tester, D. J., Castelletti, S., Giudicessi, J. R., Torchio, M., Medeiros-Domingo, A., Simone, S., Will, M. L., Dagradi, F., Schwartz, P. J., & Ackerman, M. J.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
60
Issue
15
Pages
1410-1418
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1540071197
Cited by
201
References
2
FWCI
14.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spectrum and Prevalence of Mutations Involving BrS1- Through BrS12-Susceptibility Genes in a Cohort of Unrelated Patients Referred for Brugada Syndrome Genetic Testing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.04.037
The paper
Crotti, L., Marcou, C. A., Tester, D. J., Castelletti, S., Giudicessi, J. R., Torchio, M., Medeiros-Domingo, A., Simone, S., Will, M. L., Dagradi, F., Schwartz, P. J., & Ackerman, M. J. (2012). Spectrum and Prevalence of Mutations Involving BrS1- Through BrS12-Susceptibility Genes in a Cohort of Unrelated Patients Referred for Brugada Syndrome Genetic Testing. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.04.037

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.